IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] Removing first name / last name assumptions?

Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com> Tue, 06 April 2010 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198013A68AC for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.933, BAYES_50=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_36=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CWUcbbcYgAiR for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EC83A68B3 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1663444qwb.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XeoZfOqpBQanQwN5IRN0QaDAm0d5oeEmEIeUiYKd4/8=; b=smMd1cZhxLTyk2C6dXF0IIBoexoPY2PvkVTM273i62H7312tB0oTC93LMOEBsxxi9V eOEnDaWoFos4FW7G4999Ss+AE9SM/cjEaMgNXm+/xA3lbb6leuapqAnBRuLmtvKNM1vo bvI4wSMnJLl1lgJSgfWTf88Di/WcM10eq/nrw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=t3+BcXZcR/7gtvCCfJejz98f99Fz+nzj2BXUh9USdyYRHYBi945TVdd7vICkyT3ri8 51F+aG1lXPCrT+EM94LO2dhuQXs5udz3WHiyizitovXDI45kLpjPxF9v3VsvPc86sm9s CL1uFxaLKVIPVcRZHlzaiwDoG+rsNnjOScg1Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.247.72 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BBAFA0A.7050308@comlounge.net>
References: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB738C13@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <4BBAFA0A.7050308@comlounge.net>
From: Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:17:27 -0700
Received: by 10.229.190.133 with SMTP id di5mr4177947qcb.23.1270563467148; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <k2wb325928b1004060717i4a3efc0aiabf8dceb9427f5e0@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Scholz <cs@comlounge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Removing first name / last name assumptions?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:23:25 -0000

because we are building a normative standard and we need to reference
existing standards from recognized SDOs, not draft documents without
copyright notices whose IPR status is unknown.

-cheers
-meadhbh
--
meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
@OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com



On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Christian Scholz <cs@comlounge.net> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Am 05.04.10 20:39, schrieb Hurliman, John:
>> At the IETF77 meeting there was talk about removing the first name / last name assumptions from the avatar identifier, but it looks like that conversation didn't carry over to the mailing list. Does anyone know exactly which I-Ds (and which sections) reference avatar identifiers as first_name+last_name?
>
> I still don't really understand why you aren't levering existing
> specification like OpenSocial/PortableContacts:
>
> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/1.0/Social-Data.xml#Person
> http://portablecontacts.net/draft-spec.html
>
> Shouldn't they have already most of the things defined and you would
> gain additional interoperability by using it?
>
> -- Christian
>
> --
> Christian Scholz                          Homepage: http://comlounge.net
> COM.lounge GmbH                              blog: http://mrtopf.de/blog
> Hanbrucher Str. 33                                       Skype: HerrTopf
> 52064 Aachen                             Video Blog: http://comlounge.tv
> Tel: +49 241 400 730 0                           E-Mail cs@comlounge.net
> Fax: +49 241 979 00 850                               IRC: MrTopf, Tao_T
>
> neuer Podcast: Der OpenWeb-Podcast (http://openwebpodcast.de)
> new podcast: Data Without Borders (http://datawithoutborders.net)
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email