IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] Moving startup documents into the working group

Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com> Fri, 18 June 2010 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB953A6359 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SCXyaDzPzM99 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF0D3A67A2 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so1615067qyk.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=se17NeKu71LV/wJVe0J/w07i18co6RAYJah7fYsMz7M=; b=nqERzRTC3ypfCa3VRbWdCDDo3XK+UafmAhMfDm2qgt5g+WvGudbLe0j6lhehbIDTDg vHmzA3QIV1/dRRWvmptYl2fgLKcuQ8T8UWGA/X2HC2GxX0DtGg6L7EjssjGBl0CRSJXX d92nlRLh0+pRnrMmt4EsBT6MHb5DVnens4/k4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WBd5qeupOjqSf8x7Z4tVdOMNKGvYdSTNguV1ukZJq9+CD2+fUDo01oOZKWFzUmVpwI nmnUzGCmIBCB0D7I/ru+LKlr1lM1ubtI/nDZOHBzSeaeSnTAi0dV2pg/yzqbZ0j6g9Zr be5ifsH0A5ZSre3REZkvvoO/Yu00cESAaVmGY=
Received: by 10.224.59.133 with SMTP id l5mr191650qah.51.1276820542174; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.40.17 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DDA596E1A@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <AANLkTin1VUFz26_196KCclBEEL3TJMpjb8H_hLY0T9Pv@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim3Zu0UZMhNT7Zw2dXtPGB9yn73ZhFRDql_0FSQ@mail.gmail.com> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DDA596E0B@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <AANLkTimuKSpW7uUoULs1kFW3_-aovUgXIXc7eREw1SLn@mail.gmail.com> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DDA596E1A@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
From: Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:22:02 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinxr6VOxITSYaFHBapueVrixycZ-y86atwoq_1b@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org>, "barryleiba@computer.org" <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Moving startup documents into the working group
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:22:22 -0000

yeah. peeps should imply that i +1 any draft i author.

i'm sort of abstaining in an any official vote as i'm far from being a
disinterested party. also... i wanted to give people a bit of time to
discuss the drafts before weighing in too heavily. my response to
morgaine's response was not to discuss the technical merits of the
draft, but to provide additional context as to what the draft was
supposed to address.

-cheers
-meadhbh
--
meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
@OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com



On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Hurliman, John <john.hurliman@intel.com> wrote:
> Ok. I was counting Meadhbh's follow-up e-mail addressing the launch document (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap/current/msg00154.html) as a +1, although I guess it wasn't explicitly stated.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Leiba [mailto:barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:24 PM
> To: Hurliman, John
> Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [vwrap] Moving startup documents into the working group
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Hurliman, John <john.hurliman@intel.com> wrote:
>> What happened to the launch document draft? Aside from the LLSD type
>> system, it's the only document that we have a working implementation
>> and deployment for.
>
> What happened is that we only got two votes on it, one for adopting it
> (you) and one against (Morgaine).  That's not rough consensus, so we're not adopting it yet.  See Morgaine's message:
>   http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap/current/msg00152.html
> ...for her comments about why she said no.
>
> Barry
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email