IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] xml-org-ietf-vwrap- Re: Working Draft: SNOW-375

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Thu, 05 August 2010 02:21 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7601E3A6A12 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 19:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.495, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mPxogmhFFcCW for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 19:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFDF3A6A06 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 19:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so2629194pzk.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eMfOnTg8HXt+6YKjt2dgYvVypd5GOuJCUAMSm0tCPLo=; b=ENEkq3G+niUdGFmPzGQfqkTT+E7QzwjHzIxaq9dJSF/ygXTWdNEQ5n9VKexKirw2OE wOAZdX5dWuY48kjQza9kIHgglrZJJp5//m10UkPIS6RhaNT2gbQJDOAf1RXD7FplgjFL p8xFtocq4W7PG6+ZeON3UYp/P3DI1MGuwRxEY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=i2gNmg5T7Ho6OgB5dMgHUH0WSPXre1FL04dR2+8D2U4TNxgFmhZ4k3ldd5MFkjyuG0 BQ4zg38wTYqDd4h1AVh4b91ydgMMjrYklvtxbuvkb8nBXatz3IyeFPNB0LCj5BYhzQjb BcLrlKm5qyS7snJwOACztvMWBvSPMPVh1E3A0=
Received: by 10.142.215.7 with SMTP id n7mr8559469wfg.194.1280974905326; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (adsl-68-124-103-250.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [68.124.103.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f2sm11263147wfp.23.2010.08.04.19.21.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C5A2332.4060405@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:34:26 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100329)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
References: <4C542CAC.1090301@gmail.com> <AANLkTinLVdcwHGWWuXztN6EnBA5jL56iaRvX9pR54vOX@mail.gmail.com> <4C572A6E.8070905@gmail.com> <AANLkTik1ukKWhNcJ0TgWfREf0YCd_oLutcxk8_j4b+=e@mail.gmail.com> <4C573C43.5060905@gmail.com> <4C58443F.80502@gmail.com> <4C584C52.6040309@gmail.com> <4C5967C6.4080501@gmail.com> <4646639E08F58B42836FAC24C94624DD85E085CDAE@GVW0433EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4C5A0D0F.6070900@gmail.com> <4C5A1956.8090401@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C5A1956.8090401@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vwrap] xml-org-ietf-vwrap- Re: Working Draft: SNOW-375
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 02:21:16 -0000

Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> Based on QM, I would consider the bottomost core as a crystal-state. 
> "Crystalized" is the atomic saved state I wrote into a VM. That's my 
> own direction...
>

Another thing before I forget... people want to "spin" the cube to think 
that would make it do certain calculations faster, yet the problem with 
that is those calculations are based on O((n_dimensions)*XYZ) style. I 
reiterate from time to time that it would be faster to just use 
something similar to pi r square, then it doesn't matter how many 
dimensions.

-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email