Re: [vwrap] Moving ahead with draft-ietf-vwrap-intro

Barry, I've been reviewing the Intro document for several days now, and
there are important issues there that will need a certain amount of change.
I don't expect it to be very contentious (basically the old OGP worldview
needs to be brought into line with what's already been discussed in the
group), but I will need some more days of work on it next week.

Hopefully it won't take me too long.

Morgaine.

====================================

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>wrote;wrote:

> i don't think there are any outstanding issues with the intro draft.
>
> --
> meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
> @OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Barry Leiba
> <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Since there's been no discussion, yet, about "Introduction and Goals"
> >   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-vwrap-intro
> > ...we should consider moving ahead with it.  To that end:
> >
> > 1. Meadhbh, is there anything outstanding that you think needs to be
> > addressed?  Any specific input you need from the working group?
> >
> > 2. David, can you get the IPR statement on Meadhbh's original version
> >   https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1294/
> > ...updated, if it's still applicable to the WG version?  If it's not
> > still applicable, we'd need you to tell us that.
> >
> > 3. Working group: please review the document and discuss any issues
> > with it.  Joshua and I will also appreciate comments saying "I've
> > reviewed it, and it's ready to go."
> >
> > Barry, as chair
> > _______________________________________________
> > vwrap mailing list
> > vwrap@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
> >
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>