IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] xml-org-ietf-vwrap- Re: Working Draft: SNOW-375

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Thu, 05 August 2010 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B193A67F4 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 18:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.042
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.042 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.557, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yG0KxhKF1zPL for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 18:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f172.google.com (mail-px0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723663A6784 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 18:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi20 with SMTP id 20so2579830pxi.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gcnkySfQwtD7eFEvVtEisQBeHrwvdIt5ROVZMxj7rEw=; b=wMnIube9B6D8ADtR7XJfugJFXaKlXM84YVzeCNB87awn95mCW6hIitpNUyzCvjLjtR p+yJu9gwWZFAITpw/nrB4lhzFo405giJykMl+eQeM/WoOLx1KmkWIoaUQlNICZ5OwbBb imm93xaPNyi2ZZqkyZ44fEx87cPK032Z7csZY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=j97gHKANiYxmoU2F0oz6eCvFHODD95i8aZmZu2ZQu1SiGwxX/0arbVgsb55Cz1Y2lQ JmFosZRZS2odeSvE2fbkzDmm5qcf5fojivqkKR+X2rpEAyMqyD2tvbmbvbuVLpLw4cVC L85oDbxmBafdX/zze/VkqmINyJJBVkbNb5YDk=
Received: by 10.114.113.5 with SMTP id l5mr11699982wac.53.1280972381519; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (adsl-68-124-103-250.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [68.124.103.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d35sm17109186waa.9.2010.08.04.18.39.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C5A1956.8090401@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:52:22 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100329)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
References: <4C542CAC.1090301@gmail.com> <AANLkTinLVdcwHGWWuXztN6EnBA5jL56iaRvX9pR54vOX@mail.gmail.com> <4C572A6E.8070905@gmail.com> <AANLkTik1ukKWhNcJ0TgWfREf0YCd_oLutcxk8_j4b+=e@mail.gmail.com> <4C573C43.5060905@gmail.com> <4C58443F.80502@gmail.com> <4C584C52.6040309@gmail.com> <4C5967C6.4080501@gmail.com> <4646639E08F58B42836FAC24C94624DD85E085CDAE@GVW0433EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4C5A0D0F.6070900@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C5A0D0F.6070900@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vwrap] xml-org-ietf-vwrap- Re: Working Draft: SNOW-375
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 01:39:12 -0000

Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>
> I always kept in mind... should we...with no concept of context... as 
> a subsystem? I just create the pen...
>

I almost forgot to mention purpose.

Have you noticed on the latest multi-core systems that they have 3D 
intraconnects? I'm thinking... well the first option is that subsystem 
mode would be the core underneath... which could do the same to the next 
one underneath.  So an array of 12x12x12 cores could do 2D meshed 
distribution with with nested execution in parallel. I did mention AOT, 
so "upwards" would be an exercise for you.

Based on QM, I would consider the bottomost core as a crystal-state. 
"Crystalized" is the atomic saved state I wrote into a VM. That's my own 
direction...

-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email