Re: [vwrap] Working Draft: SNOW-375

[Dzonatas Sol <[e-mail]>]

And one more thing...   (yes, I was "listening")

To expand on Zha's use-cases:

We should have a "application/xml-org-ietf-vwrap-" prefix for mime types.

That'll help with transitions, so I think this group already knows their 
postfixes.


Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>>
>> I don't see how JSON is an improvement from that.
>>
>> --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
>> Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
>>
>>
>
> In fact, JSON's best feature is being able to do the eval(), yet those 
> of us that written VMs should already know this. Verification killed 
> that feature when they tried to use it in out-of-domain style.
>
> On that note, I suggest to change the VWRAP docs where if people 
> request JSON (i.e. "application/json-*" ) that they actually want RSS 
> or ATOM styled structures. Instead, only offer RSS or ATOM structured 
> JSON (i.e. "application/json-atom" ). If they want more raw than that, 
> then it just makes sense to use XML. It's too costly for "us", and 
> they don't realize it.
>
> There may be other formats besides RSS or ATOM, so its not a 
> moratorium, yet these two are popular solutions already well 
> established. I'm sure different audiences are going to quibble, but I 
> leave it up to you to decide on support steps to change and how to 
> present them.
>


-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant