Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?

Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> Sun, 08 May 2011 04:57 UTC

Return-Path: <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E22FE06D5 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2011 21:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u-212zP8VWJY for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2011 21:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B47E0656 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 May 2011 21:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so3375462qyk.10 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 May 2011 21:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nkhzJGgvzmyp4QxuR/u1ccLC8l8DKIZGhtNDeVF42MU=; b=mSrzPCK4RuTPEBsAOjvPUF/+MFcAuvlSSFKvLZb/z6o6YT8amlo1S6t+gcZz4lFP1O OAZ50OaMWKVX2xOIXleutgUhykZXMWbF53orPnNQ10tuzI4m8gNG5AHnpqe4gcIMsKIr clokeSSoWb1vFbIEXIrXuTWnL5KTzv3pwn5Fs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=VvwKUgKwcdHd3zWVkid5Vh1SQZNrKLettXClD5LALKGrALRJeOzUDyG/mASK1MdUs/ hs5ECy2zuVQjt/ug18xVvQzK48kcUt/j18gmZR8YGVoHZCQlP6kkiGwhdIzIEPe9mASq Vl2JaJ+eGyV21u/dl01PlCEa69s4Yrkhk0t6w=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.119.134 with SMTP id z6mr2230230qcq.63.1304830654794; Sat, 07 May 2011 21:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.66.212 with HTTP; Sat, 7 May 2011 21:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DC61E3C.5080307@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=g9T5q5bVgytpxRxuE=Oc9iG2F9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC17704.3020201@gmail.com> <BANLkTimpGpNrkE3WUdurduqrVumocDRwfQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1824B.6040609@gmail.com> <BANLkTi=hhsiDs=fdZRsthp_+5Hs+pR4L6A@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1956A.5020204@gmail.com> <BANLkTik8rnsKP4xq+Gj5G4dsG=UOVnkNSQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1A8C9.9090406@gmail.com> <BANLkTikkOS34CC+ML0JNJgHDoRqbs9rY9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1D165.7010705@gmail.com> <4DC1D5FC.6040608@gmail.com> <BANLkTik81Eht3NTdLXXmgqOWvjc2s_KBnw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=-heHa35w43te0ba8NufkT+MP+CQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin6ExR7+xpodbtoTAS_4WyhUXL92Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikjKib79_rLR_s2X=X-ss-+V_yw+w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim4aY7oNALbOfZ2V-htivVmQJZDiA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=7MDUAfjJb697uRwrrxB-4v5fQ3A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=AeC1oLNGFwUWs0Yp_JNEKcaSsag@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinNtJiq4JH5qvf36kiKmFtAQArvAA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC60610.3040606@gmail.com> <BANLkTinwSxG3=3eSnKjvFSB1k7fYOEKwPg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC61E3C.5080307@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 05:57:34 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTin=tyc+rUy=RvqCJ9r34j90v1nSGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5c94eabcdeb04a2bc8f8a
Subject: Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 04:57:41 -0000

I have no idea what you're talking about Dzon, but it's a rant and not
technical.  We're meant to be discussing a technical topic here.

On the technical topic of LLSD design, earlier you wrote "*We need simple,
language agnostic (VM) approaches, not language specific approaches*", which
is exactly the position that I've been maintaining throughout all of this.
I'm glad to hear that you agree.

Joshua confirmed the language-specific design origins of LLSD for us, so
there is no doubting that.  It has led even Linden Lab into problems like
having to represent handles as a base64 blob through lack of longer integer
types than 32 bit.  It was a poor design decision even for its originators.

VWs further down the road will need a more flexible ADT system to express
their needs and to allow more efficient serializations and language bindings
to be created.  That's why I'm trying to lose the language specificity of
LLSD's past and give us more flexible data types to support efficient
serialization and fast languages.


Morgaine.



========================

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>; wrote:

> On 05/07/2011 08:45 PM, Morgaine wrote:
>
>> It appears that you haven't understood what I've written.
>>
>
> Somehow that creation attempt of yours is some magical license to endlessly
> straw man without identification. I think the good book exists about that
> already.
>
> Don't even start me on how your "social engineering" proposal could affect
> the colleges and treatment of children or child labor within your walled
> garden utopia of future virtual worlds. Even you say "that is not how it
> works" yet you want to change the past... the real past? Let me guess...
> *whoosh* ...like none of that ever happened or came close.
>
> I wonder if U.C. Berkeley Law studies France's law code on microeconomics,
> and if IETF might fork such license representation... for...  homework as
> assets.
>
>
>
> --
>
> --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
> Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>