Re: [vwrap] one question

That does not define any kind of virtual world.  It defines a client type.

Please define the *WORLD* type, not by reference to something outside the
world.

Morgaine.

============================

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Crista Lopes <lopes@ics.uci.edu> wrote:

>  On 9/24/2010 1:14 PM, Morgaine wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Crista Lopes <lopes@ics.uci.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 9/24/2010 12:38 PM, Hurliman, John wrote:
>>
>>> Have we suddenly removed the need for all web standards other than a
>>> method of fetching Javascript blobs and executing them?
>>>
>>
>>  Of course not.
>> It just seems very odd that *web-based virtual worlds* that want to
>> interoperate need to follow some standard for sending the assets to the
>> clients. This just doesn't seem related to interoperability between
>> independently-operated virtual worlds. They way I do it and the way you do
>> it doesn't seem related to our ability to send our users to each other's
>> world.
>>
>>
> Crista, to help this discussion become more technical, could you please
> define "*web-based virtual worlds*" for us, in sufficient technical detail
> to allow us to distinguish them from the much better known types of virtual
> world such as those we build from OpenSimulator?
>
>
> I already did, but here it goes one more time: virtual worlds that use the
> web browser as the client component.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>
>