Re: [vwrap] Removing first name / last name assumptions?

Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com> Tue, 06 April 2010 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2772B3A6976 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0RcNz6F9RBO5 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.221.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED473A686A for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk11 with SMTP id 11so45208qyk.13 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=prsPNahjVSt2fDMsv2Llmd8fpJD6beG295rEtVimom8=; b=BiwGgpf7xSj47zq+algbq4ahekmU4cz2e1SpGtEGgiPPvcVx3xUb7FkfA+74rF5JsQ IShUw3zr/k8xO27bnuj0KeuLnSRn8Fz++GDaucubf3F5GGrE3DQwTxeNOTsaylhcxA7U ibCP/PrIL6D5rZjlI+FA9uTBuILrIewWzPsRI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EM36eCzXFkU1hlBJfOORjNeF/T21l0MraAdKpQrmEvhzkfEudBviopncvlewWnoTJK cm9rtKm9pid138SRTGsCUycff8yxiknID/cUvB/lT4Dae3jcN5xuqRSaz+d9UPY2q3ZD Ak6WMnuq88CBe90d1XCJfXr8vB4/Aw7u6UxmY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.247.72 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <x2zf72742de1004060851rfb49f5ep823a868c345ffb64@mail.gmail.com>
References: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB738C13@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <t2jb325928b1004051220i5f1d8f04od2602f26f758f3da@mail.gmail.com> <CDB96FF3-A282-40B3-94D8-A9B6A00D8AF5@bbn.com> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB738C9B@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <y2gb325928b1004051307u5f5e64d9zd18b70bfd8307d6a@mail.gmail.com> <y2h6c9fcc2a1004052132z77168acaq26928209fa1e3e03@mail.gmail.com> <4BBB45FA.8050408@gmail.com> <j2yb325928b1004060728n29284d7fvd848fc545d54ead9@mail.gmail.com> <4BBB4D6E.60600@gmail.com> <x2zf72742de1004060851rfb49f5ep823a868c345ffb64@mail.gmail.com>
From: Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:02:10 -0700
Received: by 10.229.224.79 with SMTP id in15mr12205611qcb.76.1270569750496; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <x2mb325928b1004060902h69fe1520tcaa1bcee27eca253@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Removing first name / last name assumptions?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:10:36 -0000

okay. removing the two name option from the draft.
--
meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
@OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com



On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> wrote:
> Speaking for Linden:
> (1) For the purposes of VWRAP interop, it is acceptable to us to assume that
> a human readable agent identifier ("name") for Second Life can be coerced to
> and from a single string field. Today, SL firstname/lastname pairs are
> constrained to a subset of ASCII that disallows characters such as periods
> and spaces. Therefore, as has been mentioned, it is possible today to
> unambiguously encode an SL name as (firstname + "." + lastname) or
> (firstname + " " + lastname).
> (2) As mentioned
> at https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/features/blog/2010/01/03/happy-new-year-looking-backlooking-ahead and
> at https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/features/blog/2010/01/22/will-the-real-you-please-stand-up Linden
> is investigating modifications to "names" in SL. However, it is too early to
> comment on any details at this time.
> (3) That said, the investigative work for (2) is being done with the
> benefits of (1) held firmly in mind. (As with practically anything in the
> biz, this statement is not a contract or guarantee.)
> Therefore, from Linden's perspective, we can live with the proposed
> simplified requirements of a single string. If it becomes necessary to
> revisit that in the future we'll raise it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>
>