Re: [vwrap] SPDY

Quoted from: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2078504&cid=35782366
by: mbelshe (462412) <http://slashdot.org/%7Embelshe> writes: on Monday 
April 11, @11:56AM (#35782366 
<http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2078504&cid=35782366>)

Thanks for all the kind words on SPDY; I wish the magazine authors would 
ask before putting their own results in the titles!

Regarding standards, we're still experimenting (sorry that protocol 
changes take so long!). You can't build a new protocol without 
measuring, and we're doing just that - measuring very carefully.

Note that we aren't ignoring the standards bodies. We have presented 
this information to the IETF, and we got a lot of great feedback during 
the process. When the protocol is ready for a RFC, we'll submit one - 
but it's not ready yet.

Here are the IETF presentations on SPDY:
      http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/slides/tsvarea-0.pdf [ietf.org]
and
      https://www.tools.ietf.org/agenda/80/slides/httpbis-7.pdf [ietf.org]

I've also answered a few similar questions to this here: 
http://hackerne.ws/item?id=2420201 [hackerne.ws]

We love help- if you're passionate about protocols and want to lend 
implementation help, please hop onto spdy-dev@google.com Several 
independent implementations have already cropped up and the feedback 
continues to be really great.

Dan Olivares wrote:
> It would be nice if they could push that through the IETF.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> White paper: http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
>>
>> Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>>     
>>> Seems like GOOGLE did something similar to what I did with "bidirectional"
>>> ReSTful combines, and they called it SPDY.
>>>
>>> (read about SPDY near the bottom)
>>>
>>> http://www.conceivablytech.com/6696/products/google-chrome-gets-spdy-and-an-onscreen-keyboard
>>>
>>>       
>>>>> Google said that it saw pageload times to improve by 44 to up to 64%.
>>>>> According to the company, SPDY still uses HTTP methods, headers and �other
>>>>> semantics.� <<
>>>>>           
>>> The difference is chrome implements a modified HTTP stack (SPDY) instead
>>> of being limited to HTTP itself. So far, I only see a BSD style denotation
>>> placed on the source files.
>>>
>>> Maybe worthwhile to investigate to see how easy it is to add the
>>> ReSTful/LLSD/LLIDL combines and secure the transport within any specified
>>> trust domain.
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
>> Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> vwrap mailing list
>> vwrap@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>>
>>     
>
>   

-- 
--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant