IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] Moving startup documents into the working group

"Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com> Thu, 17 June 2010 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <john.hurliman@intel.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBF23A6B41 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.371, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rcDjflcTfKl5 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017963A6B3F for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2010 16:16:39 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,434,1272870000"; d="scan'208";a="290212013"
Received: from rrsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.57]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2010 16:16:37 -0700
Received: from rrsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com (10.31.1.129) by rrsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.31.0.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:16:37 -0600
Received: from rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.39]) by RRSMSX605.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.1.129]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:16:37 -0600
From: "Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com>
To: "barryleiba@computer.org" <barryleiba@computer.org>, "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:16:37 -0600
Thread-Topic: [vwrap] Moving startup documents into the working group
Thread-Index: AcsOcjnRold2ietbTDuMT5SMQRvk8gAAME8w
Message-ID: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DDA596E0B@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <AANLkTin1VUFz26_196KCclBEEL3TJMpjb8H_hLY0T9Pv@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim3Zu0UZMhNT7Zw2dXtPGB9yn73ZhFRDql_0FSQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim3Zu0UZMhNT7Zw2dXtPGB9yn73ZhFRDql_0FSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Moving startup documents into the working group
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:16:36 -0000

What happened to the launch document draft? Aside from the LLSD type system, it's the only document that we have a working implementation and deployment for.
John

-----Original Message-----
From: vwrap-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vwrap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:10 PM
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] Moving startup documents into the working group

Quoting from my previous message:

> It's time to think about which pre-WG documents the working group is 
> ready to adopt.  As I introduce this, I want to stress that adoption 
> of documents does NOT mean that the group has consensus on the current 
> content of those documents, that it collectively agrees with what they 
> say, that the documents are in any sense "ready".  All it means is 
> that the working group thinks they're headed in the right direction, 
> and can be used as a starting point for further refinement.  Indeed, 
> documents adopted as starting points by the working group might have a 
> number of significant revisions before they are declared "ready" and 
> are sent to the IESG.

We've had very little response to this, but the response that we've had supports adopting these:

> * Introduction and Goals
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-intro-01

> * Trust Model and User Authentication
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-authentication-01

> * Abstract Type System for the Transmission of Dynamic Structured Data
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-type-system-00

I am, therefore, approving the following document names:
 -  draft-ietf-vwrap-intro
 -  draft-ietf-vwrap-authentication
 -  draft-ietf-vwrap-type-system

Noting that these are all under Meadhbh's editorship: Meadhbh, will you please post revisions of these documents before the IETF 79
deadline of 5 July at 17:00 PDT ?   Post them with the new names as
-00 versions, and they will become working-group documents.  Please post whatever version you have of them by the deadline -- even if some have not changed since the last individual-draft version.

Thanks.

Barry, as chair
_______________________________________________
vwrap mailing list
vwrap@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email