Re: [vwrap] WebSocket / WebGL-based virtual world
Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net> Fri, 03 December 2010 15:02 UTC
Return-Path: <lenglish5@cox.net>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 587FF28C105 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:02:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-0.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJbDHDu3UZkc for
<vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (fed1rmmtao105.cox.net [68.230.241.41])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0705928C0FE for <vwrap@ietf.org>;
Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net
(InterMail vM.8.01.03.00 201-2260-125-20100507) with ESMTP id
<20101203150350.LVSR14403.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net>;
Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:03:50 -0500
Received: from ip72-200-121-127.tc.ph.cox.net ([72.200.121.127]) by
fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id ef3q1f00P2l1Ksg04f3qAE;
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:03:50 -0500
X-VR-Score: 0.00
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=nEJmMjsgzJU/SHHRi/ff9TR/+4hQZ6PdArDqWXwhaYs=
c=1 sm=1 a=TDmxT79fSwIA:10 a=Wajolswj7cQA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10
a=lHHFyFaL52RzbKbxZIYZqA==:17 a=vnREMb7VAAAA:8 a=3KUoxB9FAAAA:8
a=PtIv-SxhAAAA:8 a=4oVI4Q5rvuLpVCBAqdYA:9 a=2-PFJj_-MY9LsOaLM7DbAwVZh7EA:4
a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lHHFyFaL52RzbKbxZIYZqA==:117
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Authentication-Results: cox.net; none
Message-ID: <4CF906D6.8050500@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:03:50 -0700
From: Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vwrap@ietf.org
References: <E5B428A8-EC5E-4CD8-93C0-8637C6FA5981@bbn.com>
<AANLkTi=dZ2dToB9eDkaVmjeNKfvhfcf41fo6DPGR0-0S@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=dZ2dToB9eDkaVmjeNKfvhfcf41fo6DPGR0-0S@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [vwrap] WebSocket / WebGL-based virtual world
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lenglish5@cox.net
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group
<vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 15:02:35 -0000
> it's cool, for sure, but they're using a proprietary protocol based on > google protocol buffers for their back end stuff. i chatted with > henrik last year and he seemed completely un-interested in > participating in a standardization effort. > Yesterday, I sat in on a meeting with the imersive Education folk concerning their Open File Format, and Sikarata was being touted as a potential participant in that part of stndardization. iED's big thing about optimization is currently the ability to serve files from Wonderland servers to realXtend worlds, and presumeably in the other direction. This is demoed starting around 7 minutes into this video: http://www.youtube.com/ImmersiveED#p/u/0/cMhBiu0YJ3s The announcement of the file format is here: http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=l9v8jddab&v=0012Q4V8GYbFiRVW5S52Wafi9DbYKi8ApYvpFG686SUd4B5TAMcsgez8TsHQyBGOBUtllVn7F83vdrtw7wzMw5mWi3zeu29ak8hSDeywTXeE6QKBh0Ty-BQ6g%3D%3D > at the risk of touching off another flame war (morgaine likes to > violently argue what my motivations were last year) i should just > mention that some of us wanted to develop a protocol to allow > different VW related services to be hosted in different domains. > That's obviously already happening with the iED endorsed worlds, at least on the level of demos. > i would be VERY interested in sirikata if they were to start focusing on that. > In order to get acknowledge by iED, they had to pledge to work on that. That was part of what yesterday's (2 Dec 2010) meeting was about. I raised the "holy grail" of TP between worlds while maintaining identity and hopefully appearance for the avatar, and everyone agreed that was the long-term goal. I can only suggest VWRAP folks get in touch with Aaron Walsh of immersive Education and try to coordinate things better. http://gridinstitute.com/people/aew/ The virtual worlds involved in the iED currently or prospectively are OpenWonderland & realXtend/OpenSim and sirikata and OpenCobalt. Lawson
- [vwrap] WebSocket / WebGL-based virtual world Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [vwrap] WebSocket / WebGL-based virtual world Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] WebSocket / WebGL-based virtual world Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] WebSocket / WebGL-based virtual world Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] WebSocket / WebGL-based virtual world Lawson English
- Re: [vwrap] WebSocket / WebGL-based virtual world Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] WebSocket / WebGL-based virtual world Nexii Malthus