Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?

[Morgaine <[e-mail]>]

Indeed Robert.  We're defining a new ADT system for VWRAP, and LLSD was
merely the initial input.

I think we should call the types system that we're defining something like
VWRAP-ATS (VWRAP Abstract Types System), to avoid it being confused with the
current LLSD.

Despite repeated explanation that nothing we define here will alter the LLSD
employed by Second Life (we don't have the power to do that), people still
fail to distinguish between our ADT system and Linden's.  Only a new name
will fix that ambiguity.



Morgaine.




==========================


On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Robert G. Jakabosky
<[e-mail]>wrote:

> On Sunday 08, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> > If that alone is too hard to comprehend, then your "designing for the
> > future" ignores complete backward compatibility and the many
> > implementations that already exist.
>
> -1
>
> Why should VWRAP keep backwards compatibility to anything when we haven't
> even
> published a standard yet.  The current LLSD spec is a draft and not set in
> stone.  Current LLSD implementations may have to change before this
> standardization process is finished.
>
> --
> Robert G. Jakabosky
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>