Re: [vwrap] [wvrap] Simulation consistency

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Mon, 04 April 2011 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E8D3A6989 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.093
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.394, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_DIPLOMA2=0.9]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iH80bQ3zOnxp for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fep15.mx.upcmail.net (fep15.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F513A67A1 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge03.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep15-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20110404121128.UFIS1633.viefep15-int.chello.at@edge03.upcmail.net>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:11:28 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge03.upcmail.net with edge id TQBS1g02T0FlQed03QBTsL; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:11:28 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1Q6icw-0007Eg-HA; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:11:26 +0200
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:11:26 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: "dyerbrookme@juno.com" <dyerbrookme@juno.com>
Message-ID: <20110404141126.621cfcec@hikaru.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20110402.161242.14055.0@webmail07.vgs.untd.com>
References: <20110402.161242.14055.0@webmail07.vgs.untd.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=HQ3F56nxkum+cgCiDL7AXQpbvw7DWrWCBJRnYYnM0Zc= c=1 sm=0 a=CxkBH-eyvKEA:10 a=lF6S9qf5Q1oA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=NoAKp6exAAAA:8 a=BjFOTwK7AAAA:8 a=3D6hEhHG_RrHcGq_CaUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=B0cvAcWxpcAA:10 a=bW3kdApBr58A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] [wvrap] Simulation consistency
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:09:49 -0000

On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 20:12:42 GMT
"dyerbrookme@juno.com" <dyerbrookme@juno.com> wrote:

> Dear Patnad, I post on this list about twice a year. My post is not a
> rant, it is not a flame, it is not a troll, it is not a personal
> attack.

For the record, whatever it was.. I choose deliberately
to ignore it (not reply) and I stopped reading somewhere
halfway when it was clear what kind of person was writing
it.

So call it what you want, you might want to reconsider your
diplomatic skills.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>