[vwrap] Moving startup documents into the working group

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

It's time to think about which pre-WG documents the working group is
ready to adopt.  As I introduce this, I want to stress that adoption
of documents does NOT mean that the group has consensus on the current
content of those documents, that it collectively agrees with what they
say, that the documents are in any sense "ready".  All it means is
that the working group thinks they're headed in the right direction,
and can be used as a starting point for further refinement.  Indeed,
documents adopted as starting points by the working group might have a
number of significant revisions before they are declared "ready" and
are sent to the IESG.

That said, the chairs would like to take a poll on whether the
following are ready for adoption on their next revisions:

* Introduction and Goals
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-intro-01

* Trust Model and User Authentication
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-authentication-01

* Abstract Type System for the Transmission of Dynamic Structured Data
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-type-system-00

* Client Application Launch Message
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-launch-00

* Foundation
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lentczner-vwrap-foundation-00


Please reply in this thread as in this example, listing each document
and giving your opinion:
> Introduction and Goals - yes
> Trust Model and User Authentication - yes
> Abstract Type System - yes
> Client Application Launch Message - yes
> Foundation - yes

Please make your opinion either "yes" (the working group should adopt
the document) or "no" (the working group should not adopt the
document).

Please do not discuss anything else in this thread.  If you need to
discuss your answer, please start a new thread, with a new subject
line, for the discussion.  If you have any issues you prefer to bring
to the chairs off-list, contact us at <[e-mail]>rg>.

Thanks very much.

-- Barry, as chair