[vwrap] is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?

Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com> Tue, 03 May 2011 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A357EE06B6 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2011 07:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PYyPEq-Frzgl for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2011 07:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E254E0684 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2011 07:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so108584wyb.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 May 2011 07:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=F358dI6j7ewnF4TOiZ9MKIt1dbN5nGEwAQRix5poS5s=; b=fFb67BK2WFh6OtyKqVy4dtuL6rLA9OYzBUFovzqsBus9Vdr+xoYBUJxN5mBtbPAIss FJ4cGIT7hrKqjODaJfsCPdkZRlGTmgw+FykQQisxuayauRbzK5XWlQmKsS4Brt2OBgBV Z9gm/FLL6YCleIENIS5l72mZtIhL1CkR314eQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=ntDUO1lT592/KgN+DivBDgN8CLpcjgO+qnykkptcUPScyQuK50BBd5NujbiOzmd1se za1l/FyPz+Y1dkE2Qvq418BYzjgfCJHQ4XxsogtUAhQ3hzyRHGwV5eWXOzimDDEOGzmN cvIIxvCqph1bRzAoxR/Ss6VD+2E4jtQ9ZJnyY=
Received: by with SMTP id l2mr3665212wef.114.1304432415134; Tue, 03 May 2011 07:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2011 07:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 07:19:55 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=g9T5q5bVgytpxRxuE=Oc9iG2F9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [vwrap] is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 14:20:18 -0000

is anyone in this group still interested in using LLSD (or it's successor, DSD)?

if so, i'm going to publish the DSD draft here. if not, i'm going to
wait for the group to say "we are in no way interested in LLSD or DSD"
and then submit it as an individual submission to the RFC editor. it's
been about three years, and i would really like to get an RFC
published so i can take the X- off all my application/llsd family of
mime types.

so... may i see a show of hands... is anyone still planning on
implementing a system with LLSD in this group?

please just respond yes or no in reply to this thread. i'll start
another thread for discussion.

meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
@OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com