IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vwrap] one question

Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> Sat, 25 September 2010 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B423A6B1F for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.177, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dFkb38ZMg7zw for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E513A6AA5 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so1999634qyk.10 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+W+RAgbVQyQfP3opaiW/XcunD852JrwLl+ThXy4gvvk=; b=k4n1LIU/MrYZeK6feib3pOJAACYxfTxPrjviqOzydtibL24gg/VyecFKXHheQOEclP VX2sM/PznK5x0/WQQbDA+2Apwzt8wjXFJWPFpL/baICYHH7cQdfGaeUvB+1phpfFT2VU sVW72FG976m2xZfbNJcGrdkPLUr2d+xgSRGeo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=j9LAW3uULxQXwzwghhagiceMLAkZDIrrdxm36G3zP1465pUrQMZJkFrSihs/FZcPLT wxLnjDM7hxH4OfBydfNaBKnj/qn7hGq/632PNW6lEYDJftsPL6byfTz/bf3PV9ERY8gB mQjoIWUZ7PHTZXE1QK998rfVlEd+XWrWJzYmQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.11.20 with SMTP id r20mr3036407qar.113.1285374083266; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.232.69 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C9D3621.8050804@ics.uci.edu>
References: <4C9AB1BB.2010008@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTi=fz6LhpRaTJr7Bu4KsXS93-B0B7SzjH4PwDGuc@mail.gmail.com> <4C9B7041.50908@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTim-BvM-z90DjRcXD1r1bvZ1doSxzq6-Ou4jg-V7@mail.gmail.com> <B404AC53EB6E4A90A58B2C606CF66045@TWEEDY64> <AANLkTim98XGBrUQOVs0a1iyJD5AOq9nBPhcbZYgU6tro@mail.gmail.com> <4C9BAFF4.5010702@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTinaghw0KwwvCQn8sEE5787C5zvdvt0Mos_qvByA@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimTV2g__Bmr9vexgKy5OjDubrjqFj-7Foe6nSGW@mail.gmail.com> <4C9CBFF5.2000508@ics.uci.edu> <OF86D28401.33705A10-ON852577A8.006059AE-852577A8.00654907@us.ibm.com> <4C9CF6F2.4040905@ics.uci.edu> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D012AD7DF4E@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <4C9D03A1.1070603@ics.uci.edu> <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D012AD7DFB0@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <4C9D0C8E.5040109@ics.uci.edu> <AANLkTi=3U4sk7Hn4hUu0aXoiBT5qm1eZ=TZUiwJ1Jqek@mail.gmail.com> <4C9D3621.8050804@ics.uci.edu>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 01:21:23 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimvkXqULU5nQYcXxscGjzfveVi__26fiHc9FTpU@mail.gmail.com>
From: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
To: Crista Lopes <lopes@ics.uci.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cdd64a2f75c04910a79c0
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] one question
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:20:52 -0000

Sure, I've seen that Quake II demo in a browser.  Nice, and very promising.

That doesn't help us here though.

As I wrote, virtual worlds are far more complex than web pages, and can't be
handled in the same ad hoc fashion as web pages if we expect any useful
amount of interop to occur.  Browsers becoming more powerful doesn't modify
this situation at all.  Complexity doesn't decrease just because you can
process code faster with newer technology.


Morgaine.




=================================

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Crista Lopes <lopes@ics.uci.edu> wrote:

> On 9/24/2010 2:05 PM, Morgaine wrote:
>
>> Virtual worlds are far more complex than web pages, and can't be handled
>> in the same ad hoc fashion as web pages if we expect any useful amount of
>> interop to occur.
>>
>
> Morgaine, just in case you missed this:
> http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2010/04/look-ma-no-plugin.html
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email