Re: [vwrap] one question
Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> Thu, 23 September 2010 03:00 UTC
Return-Path: <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id AC77C3A6A9A for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.726
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.726 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.250,
BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q8AJYCFnC2IK for
<vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com
[209.85.216.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349663A6A97 for
<vwrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so982455qwc.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>;
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=e0yCZLeiiMeilB2EMWhXm+4DD7oIBLvWMCBHFSbKeH0=;
b=VbcfQwp6tG0GTUuYedZoRHF03v1IG9iMEw7T1h6TXAz2KmILCV9+GvsrGlQDE53kvn
l/XOLeyWUWl7CqGHLB5c+uqqLkcASpgLm6jTaLbgN5bwp47ItshoYUuPb3aazNizCLRA
R9AVvnJrKlpzVjCz/P6o5jImiIl7Bi2dJf8j8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
b=rn15RzROS9w5NBnWIuVE/Ks1Gp3GfcaTCTOoF/8bppUdxGZ/ZR0yc5sC8IFXriiFK5
aGOF3AzlBEMs/Jqi5psAgQMzpMfhokq3txOUQdkcBKqUOtIZDXXidWruVLc5jghWM7jU
U936du6t6lJa7sSBn6H7JqlJ+IDk4JcToKDok=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.96.160 with SMTP id h32mr752386qan.269.1285210873185;
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.232.69 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C9AB1BB.2010008@ics.uci.edu>
References: <4C9AB1BB.2010008@ics.uci.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 04:01:13 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=fz6LhpRaTJr7Bu4KsXS93-B0B7SzjH4PwDGuc@mail.gmail.com>
From: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
To: lopes@ics.uci.edu
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f89957e8ec9390490e4790f
Cc: "vwrap@ietf.org" <vwrap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [vwrap] one question
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group
<vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>,
<mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 03:00:46 -0000
Crista, the simple answer is *Yes*, but a more accurate answer is that the question is not really very well posed, because it suggests things about VWRAP that aren't really applicable. The *Yes* answer is actually an answer to the question "Is VWRAP a suitable framework for developing protocols for interoperability between virtual worlds based on OpenSimulator (or similar). Sure, that's the idea. :-))) But in VWRAP, it is immaterial what kind of client application runs the client endpoint of the VWRAP protocols, so the phrase "virtual worlds that use the web browser as the client" doesn't really make much sense in our context. The answer is *Yes* only because we scratch our heads and then ignore the phrase as an unnecessary condition. Sure, why not? :-))) Admittedly, your student would probably need to do some rather unnatural coding since the VW model is really quite distant from the Web model, and Javascript in the browser runs sandboxed so it's an interesting question how your client would be coaxed to talk to various external services, for example to be able to see assets worn by visitors from other worlds. (Remember that VWRAP is not tied to the SL model in which everything is proxied through the current sim, a highly non-scalable arrangement.) I think that answers your question from the VWRAP end, but I get the feeling there's something missing still. Perhaps I could pose a question of my own to help the discussion: Do you consider a "virtual world that uses the web browser as the client" to be significantly different to a virtual world that doesn't define the type of client? I would hope your answer is "No", since otherwise it would suggest that worlds are going to Balkanize by the clients they use, which of course would help nobody, and interop would be compromised. Morgaine. =========================== On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Cristina Videira Lopes <lopes@ics.uci.edu>wrote;wrote: > Let me summarize my main puzzlement with the drafts, and with some of the > things stated here, with one very simple yes/no question that, hopefully, > the group will get to a consensus in no time: > > I have a student starting to work on a JavaScript+HTML5 viewer for > brain-dead-simple, multi-user, OpenSimulator-served scenes. I can do that > very easily with OpenSim, since the client protocol is a plugin. Is VWRAP > set up to develop protocols for interoperability between virtual worlds > that, like these ones, use the web browser as the client? > a) Yes > b) No > > People's answers? > > _______________________________________________ > vwrap mailing list > vwrap@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap >
- [vwrap] one question Cristina Videira Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Jonathan Freedman
- Re: [vwrap] one question Hurliman, John
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- [vwrap] Fwd: one question Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] one question Cristina Videira Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question David W Levine
- [vwrap] End point "behavior" (was: one question) Boroondas Gupte
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" (was: one questi… Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" (was: one questi… Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] one question kevin.tweedy
- Re: [vwrap] one question kevin.tweedy
- Re: [vwrap] one question Mike Dickson
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question kevin.tweedy
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] End point "behavior" Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question David W Levine
- [vwrap] Cautionary thought... David W Levine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Sean Hennessee
- Re: [vwrap] one question Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Cristina Videira Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question David W Levine
- [vwrap] Constructive Progress David W Levine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Mike Dickson
- Re: [vwrap] one question Hurliman, John
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Hurliman, John
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Hurliman, John
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Hurliman, John
- Re: [vwrap] one question Sean Hennessee
- Re: [vwrap] one question Sean Hennessee
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine
- Re: [vwrap] one question Crista Lopes
- Re: [vwrap] one question Morgaine