Re: [vwrap] Technical basis for VW client in a web browser?

A technical assessment supporting it? Do you mean what technologies might be
used to implement it?

If you're interested in justification, I suspect it's more of a
business/marketing decision than a technical one. Could be something along
the lines of providing initial exposure of virtual worlds to those who may
hesitate at downloading and installing a separate client for something they
aren't familiar with. Once they decide they are interested then they may be
enticed to install a full client. Business/marketing professionals should
have the necessary tools to do a quantitative assessment supporting such a
concept.

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Morgaine
<morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>wrote;wrote:

> Has anyone seen a well argued technical assessment supporting the concept
> of "VW client in a browser"?
>
> I would be very interested to read such an article or post.  Everything
> I've read so far doesn't hold up at all technically, and just highlights the
> huge impedance mismatch.
>
>
> Morgaine.
>
>
>
>
> ========================================
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Richard L. Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com> wrote:
>
>> Folks on this list are probably better plugged in to this stuff than I am,
>> but in case people hadn't heard: Earlier this week, Katalabs released a
>> virtual world based on WebSockets and WebGL.
>>
>> <http://www.katalabs.com/blog/2010/11/30/kataspace-released/>
>> <
>> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/12/kataspace-browser-based-virtual-world-built-with-webgl-and-html5.ars
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> vwrap mailing list
>> vwrap@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>
>