Re: [vwrap] [wvrap] Simulation consistency

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Sat, 02 April 2011 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA5B3A686E for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rEKFkiGADtQ2 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fep18.mx.upcmail.net (fep18.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.38]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB613A686C for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge05.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.212]) by viefep18-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20110402170856.VPCZ1353.viefep18-int.chello.at@edge05.upcmail.net> for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:08:56 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge05.upcmail.net with edge id Sh8u1g00w0FlQed05h8vrz; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 19:08:56 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1Q64Jh-0004CO-Vt for vwrap@ietf.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 19:08:54 +0200
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 19:08:53 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20110402190853.7c525764@hikaru.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=cUdG0gaTCbgR0Y1=YUEOQxLgwA1XONG0Ptg4r@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTint6CiMRZWj59sEYM2j7VoKgz4-Bw@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimuVubm5Becx8cg_Uq2Gdj8EjHL7maMyqWOeYCJ@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=k8CtSx8q+2f1iPszpL3DmBsdpF0+wthSz5T1A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinV9xefD429trmZU=Q3yJTetc_BAg@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=cUdG0gaTCbgR0Y1=YUEOQxLgwA1XONG0Ptg4r@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=tMVj8KYobzzX0EiRnC7vY2isLrCxFvdg4RrHWPZXwJ0= c=1 sm=0 a=CxkBH-eyvKEA:10 a=lF6S9qf5Q1oA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=mK_AVkanAAAA:8 a=BjFOTwK7AAAA:8 a=mqISKdNJmrkE4mHaEg4A:9 a=8_7yNeBXZWXb_h9ul9MA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=9xyTavCNlvEA:10 a=bW3kdApBr58A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
Subject: Re: [vwrap] [wvrap] Simulation consistency
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 17:07:17 -0000

On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 16:09:49 +0100
Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> wrote:
> That easily maps to an optional capability request of course.  If the
> asset service answers "No" to you, then you can deny the incoming
> avatar entry to your region, returning a status that indicates
> 
> RESPONSE: "*Asset service X referenced by asset Y does not meet the
> re-distribution requirement requested for entry to region Z*".

At which point, as a user, I'd like to have the option to
detach / take off (replace) whatever I'm using from asset
service X, rather than to completely be banned from entering
the region.  If the result is that I look aweful, then the
only requirement I have is that I see the same thing as
others, after I can I make the decision to either avoid using
asset server Y for future purchases, or to avoid entering
this region.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>