Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Sun, 08 May 2011 04:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFDEE069D for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2011 21:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.353, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id upu0EqAZpnwM for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2011 21:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com (mail-px0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEE8E067F for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 May 2011 21:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi2 with SMTP id 2so2663557pxi.38 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 May 2011 21:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nYp3ZBcMwMuiTZyMWMz1qo/ePUPeyoMVGknGagpLMlQ=; b=QdJ24LzyLULRCfRAOpTIiLcPNRg1WEbKfOcvE9zLCOiUNawRUoNZ5ghACWypXGGrvP Ca1xjNrmnxdbjUjVvnHxzw79ha0J+M0qlDmrn6I9E30lyOaB2bgGcrb37/CtDHeA5sUN 4WRAJAVDavH69GHv68DHjlOjli6ror7Sp06Lo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HgKeOumS1aJa07PEXDxM/Yl+oThFwaVKYSRWJ1KIzgvuTMonq07Bn4T/ob6LLUjGcb v1AyRlrYYlnuCMAFqoaT4UqTsa0++oWaFZoJMoX838zJ3nWRR8hB4UYoGA/CFJi6LyTK 6Judq2PIsmV+89527IXg//H5ZY0/DU+S4zxTQ=
Received: by 10.68.50.161 with SMTP id d1mr7664102pbo.439.1304829560759; Sat, 07 May 2011 21:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] ([70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d9sm3224322pbs.10.2011.05.07.21.39.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 May 2011 21:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DC61E3C.5080307@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 21:38:20 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vwrap@ietf.org
References: <BANLkTi=g9T5q5bVgytpxRxuE=Oc9iG2F9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC17704.3020201@gmail.com> <BANLkTimpGpNrkE3WUdurduqrVumocDRwfQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1824B.6040609@gmail.com> <BANLkTi=hhsiDs=fdZRsthp_+5Hs+pR4L6A@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1956A.5020204@gmail.com> <BANLkTik8rnsKP4xq+Gj5G4dsG=UOVnkNSQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1A8C9.9090406@gmail.com> <BANLkTikkOS34CC+ML0JNJgHDoRqbs9rY9w@mail.gmail.com> <4DC1D165.7010705@gmail.com> <4DC1D5FC.6040608@gmail.com> <BANLkTik81Eht3NTdLXXmgqOWvjc2s_KBnw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=-heHa35w43te0ba8NufkT+MP+CQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin6ExR7+xpodbtoTAS_4WyhUXL92Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikjKib79_rLR_s2X=X-ss-+V_yw+w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim4aY7oNALbOfZ2V-htivVmQJZDiA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=7MDUAfjJb697uRwrrxB-4v5fQ3A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=AeC1oLNGFwUWs0Yp_JNEKcaSsag@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinNtJiq4JH5qvf36kiKmFtAQArvAA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC60610.3040606@gmail.com> <BANLkTinwSxG3=3eSnKjvFSB1k7fYOEKwPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinwSxG3=3eSnKjvFSB1k7fYOEKwPg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [vwrap] The <embed> tag... is the group still interested in LLSD or DSD?
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 04:39:24 -0000

On 05/07/2011 08:45 PM, Morgaine wrote:
> It appears that you haven't understood what I've written.

Somehow that creation attempt of yours is some magical license to 
endlessly straw man without identification. I think the good book exists 
about that already.

Don't even start me on how your "social engineering" proposal could 
affect the colleges and treatment of children or child labor within your 
walled garden utopia of future virtual worlds. Even you say "that is not 
how it works" yet you want to change the past... the real past? Let me 
guess...   *whoosh* ...like none of that ever happened or came close.

I wonder if U.C. Berkeley Law studies France's law code on 
microeconomics, and if IETF might fork such license representation... 
for...  homework as assets.


-- 

--- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant