Re: Next call
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 11 February 2011 11:39 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B91AC3A6AE6 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:39:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.194
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-106.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.595, BAYES_00=-2.599,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x9hzu-HHL9jg for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:39:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29793A68B7 for
<w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:39:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.52.84]) (using TLSv1
with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by
smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C39C509EF;
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:39:45 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Next call
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4D5433DB.9060805@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:39:42 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4F040C64-EF15-4F57-9279-9A374459AAB0@mnot.net>
References: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net>
<3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net> <4CF93734.7070402@stpeter.im>
<8762D8F9-5B98-412D-BC5C-F35EE8BCC954@mnot.net> <4CFA2285.8000401@isode.com>
<EB2FC9EB-B541-4028-8F2B-758B1D458515@mnot.net> <4D5433DB.9060805@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: w3c-policy <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:39:39 -0000
Thanks, peter. Why don't you send out a doodle for people's availability? If we can wait a few weeks (early March, e.g., week of the 7th), I'll be in the US, and that might simplify scheduling... On 11/02/2011, at 5:52 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > I think it's time to revisit. :) > > I'm happy to organize this meeting. > > On 12/5/10 6:07 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> OK. Let's revisit in January, then. >> >> >> On 04/12/2010, at 10:14 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >> >>> Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> >>>> Good in theory, but I'll be out of contact until Jan 24. >>>> >>> And of January is Ok we well. Unless people really prefer to have a phone call before Christmas (I am unavailable Dec 8-15). >>> >>>> On 04/12/2010, at 5:30 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>>> >>>>> How about mid January? That would give folks time to complete some >>>>> post-holiday action items before the next call. >>>>> >>>>> On 11/3/10 11:32 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps obviously, we skipped this one due to lack of interest / availability. >>>>>> >>>>>> Should we try to schedule one more before the end of the year? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 18/10/2010, at 1:17 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> As discussed at our last call, we're aiming to have our next call the week before W3C TPAC. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To that end, please fill out the following poll with your preferred times: >>>>>>> http://doodle.com/z75e2nms6yzv2pye >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >>>>>>> > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call John C Klensin
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Philippe Le Hegaret
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Thomas Roessler
- post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… John C Klensin
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Russ Housley
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre