Re: Next call
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 04 November 2010 05:32 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 484023A68E8 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.753
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-104.753 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.154, BAYES_00=-2.599,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-zTDlpSiiJ1 for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FCC3A635F for
<w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.39.135]) (using TLSv1
with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by
smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AC6D509B3 for
<w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 01:32:30 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Subject: Re: Next call
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:32:27 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net>
References: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net>
To: w3c-policy <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 05:32:30 -0000
Perhaps obviously, we skipped this one due to lack of interest / availability. Should we try to schedule one more before the end of the year? Regards, On 18/10/2010, at 1:17 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > As discussed at our last call, we're aiming to have our next call the week before W3C TPAC. > > To that end, please fill out the following poll with your preferred times: > http://doodle.com/z75e2nms6yzv2pye > > Cheers, > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call John C Klensin
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Philippe Le Hegaret
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Thomas Roessler
- post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… John C Klensin
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Russ Housley
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre