IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Next call

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 06 July 2010 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9ABF3A6822 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.963
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.963 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.364, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YWizQM9AHNVk for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BD33A676A for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-121.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-121.cisco.com [64.101.72.121]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85D9A40E36; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:19:25 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4C3381B8.1030703@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:19:20 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
Subject: Re: Next call
References: <5061509E-334F-4C11-92DE-337BEBE2487C@mnot.net> <18927299-AB3F-4F1B-ABC6-D33E4EFBA9C0@mnot.net> <ADFC9B67FCC0DF6A1682C243@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <ADFC9B67FCC0DF6A1682C243@PST.JCK.COM>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080601010704010201000402"
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:19:27 -0000

On 7/6/10 1:14 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> 
> --On Friday, July 02, 2010 14:40 -0700 Mark Nottingham
> <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
>> Right now, we have two participants from the IETF, one from
>> the W3C, and two or three possible time slots.
>>
>> Anyone else? If no-one wants to come from the US, it does make
>> finding a time simpler...
> 
> Mark,
> 
> I keep strange hours, so am generally less sensitive to times
> than I am to days.    But, somehow, the doodle poll announcement
> got past me in the general confusion.  Have filled it in now,
> ignoring yesterday and today which I assume would be hard.

I've doodled as well. Right now Thursday at 13:00 UTC is all green.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email