Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 22 November 2010 03:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A300228C104 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:38:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.924
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.924 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9anY-6FSF73t for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:38:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181CB28C0DC for <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:38:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.2.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7124522E1F3; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:39:26 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <26C94C81-D37D-4A99-990F-AC8E8516D7B4@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:39:23 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <08C0EE68-B245-4836-AFF9-7DBC1BCA7543@mnot.net>
References: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net> <3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net> <1288857104.2553.74.camel@chacal> <4CD27037.4050403@isode.com> <061235D3-D1D0-4D2A-BC65-E6533D086D56@w3.org> <26C94C81-D37D-4A99-990F-AC8E8516D7B4@w3.org>
To: w3c-policy <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Philippe_Le_H=E9garet?= <plh@w3.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 03:38:39 -0000

So everyone is (hopefully) home; should we try for a call before the end of the year?

Regards,


On 09/11/2010, at 8:34 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> Out of the TPAC meeting, we seem to have the following agenda items lined up:
> 
> - debrief from Alexey's meeting with the TAG
> - Larry Masinter's mime info draft
> - IRI next steps / HTML5 dependency / Barth's draft
>  (though it looks like Adam's draft is now showing up as draft-ietf-something)
> - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02
>  impact on IRI? impact on Web? who should review?
> - IAB/TAG coordination next steps
> 
> Not sure how urgent they are. But let's see what else comes up in Beijing.
> 
> 
> On 4 Nov 2010, at 10:25, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> 
>> \On 4 Nov 2010, at 09:35, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> 
>>> Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
>>>> Alexey, Thomas and I met last night and we went through a list of some
>>>> pending items:
>>>> 
>>>> - hybi: how to sync between the protocol spec and the API spec. It's not
>>>> to clear how stable the protocol spec is and whether W3C should urge its
>>>> group to update the API part.
>>>> 
>>>> - powder mime type: I agreed to send an update on this front to Alexey.
>>>> This one has been a long standing one in my TODO list.
>>>> 
>>>> - IRI: the group has been productive in the past 6 weeks.
>>>> 
>>>> At this point, I don't feel the need to have a call. Thomas might
>>>> disagree.
>>>> 
>>> Actually, let's decide after the IETF in Beijing, in case something new comes up (e.g. more details on HTTP Streaming related discussions).
>> 
>> works for me
>> 
>>> 
>>>> Philippe
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 16:32 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Perhaps obviously, we skipped this one due to lack of interest / availability.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Should we try to schedule one more before the end of the year?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 18/10/2010, at 1:17 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> As discussed at our last call, we're aiming to have our next call the week before W3C TPAC.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To that end, please fill out the following poll with your preferred times:
>>>>>> http://doodle.com/z75e2nms6yzv2pye
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/