Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 22 November 2010 03:38 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id A300228C104 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:38:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.924
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-104.924 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.325, BAYES_00=-2.599,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9anY-6FSF73t for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:38:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181CB28C0DC for
<w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:38:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.2.20]) (using TLSv1
with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by
smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7124522E1F3;
Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:39:26 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <26C94C81-D37D-4A99-990F-AC8E8516D7B4@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:39:23 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <08C0EE68-B245-4836-AFF9-7DBC1BCA7543@mnot.net>
References: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net>
<3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net>
<1288857104.2553.74.camel@chacal> <4CD27037.4050403@isode.com>
<061235D3-D1D0-4D2A-BC65-E6533D086D56@w3.org>
<26C94C81-D37D-4A99-990F-AC8E8516D7B4@w3.org>
To: w3c-policy <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Philippe_Le_H=E9garet?= <plh@w3.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 03:38:39 -0000
So everyone is (hopefully) home; should we try for a call before the end of the year? Regards, On 09/11/2010, at 8:34 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote: > Out of the TPAC meeting, we seem to have the following agenda items lined up: > > - debrief from Alexey's meeting with the TAG > - Larry Masinter's mime info draft > - IRI next steps / HTML5 dependency / Barth's draft > (though it looks like Adam's draft is now showing up as draft-ietf-something) > - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 > impact on IRI? impact on Web? who should review? > - IAB/TAG coordination next steps > > Not sure how urgent they are. But let's see what else comes up in Beijing. > > > On 4 Nov 2010, at 10:25, Thomas Roessler wrote: > >> \On 4 Nov 2010, at 09:35, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >> >>> Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: >>>> Alexey, Thomas and I met last night and we went through a list of some >>>> pending items: >>>> >>>> - hybi: how to sync between the protocol spec and the API spec. It's not >>>> to clear how stable the protocol spec is and whether W3C should urge its >>>> group to update the API part. >>>> >>>> - powder mime type: I agreed to send an update on this front to Alexey. >>>> This one has been a long standing one in my TODO list. >>>> >>>> - IRI: the group has been productive in the past 6 weeks. >>>> >>>> At this point, I don't feel the need to have a call. Thomas might >>>> disagree. >>>> >>> Actually, let's decide after the IETF in Beijing, in case something new comes up (e.g. more details on HTTP Streaming related discussions). >> >> works for me >> >>> >>>> Philippe >>>> >>>> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 16:32 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>>> >>>>> Perhaps obviously, we skipped this one due to lack of interest / availability. >>>>> >>>>> Should we try to schedule one more before the end of the year? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 18/10/2010, at 1:17 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> As discussed at our last call, we're aiming to have our next call the week before W3C TPAC. >>>>>> >>>>>> To that end, please fill out the following poll with your preferred times: >>>>>> http://doodle.com/z75e2nms6yzv2pye >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call John C Klensin
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Philippe Le Hegaret
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Thomas Roessler
- post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… John C Klensin
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Russ Housley
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre