Re: Next call

Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> Thu, 04 November 2010 07:51 UTC

Return-Path: <plh@w3.org>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574E23A691A for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kkDtsqXZEDr for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B363A68F5 for <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 82.50-14-84.ripe.coltfrance.com ([84.14.50.82] helo=[172.60.1.17]) by jay.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <plh@w3.org>) id 1PDuc9-0005Q2-62; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 03:52:05 -0400
Subject: Re: Next call
From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net>
References: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net> <3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:51:44 +0100
Message-ID: <1288857104.2553.74.camel@chacal>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: w3c-policy <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:51:57 -0000

Alexey, Thomas and I met last night and we went through a list of some
pending items:

- hybi: how to sync between the protocol spec and the API spec. It's not
to clear how stable the protocol spec is and whether W3C should urge its
group to update the API part.

- powder mime type: I agreed to send an update on this front to Alexey.
This one has been a long standing one in my TODO list.

- IRI: the group has been productive in the past 6 weeks.

At this point, I don't feel the need to have a call. Thomas might
disagree.

Philippe

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 16:32 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Perhaps obviously, we skipped this one due to lack of interest / availability.
> 
> Should we try to schedule one more before the end of the year?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> On 18/10/2010, at 1:17 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> > As discussed at our last call, we're aiming to have our next call the week before W3C TPAC.
> > 
> > To that end, please fill out the following poll with your preferred times:
> >  http://doodle.com/z75e2nms6yzv2pye
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
>