Re: 2010-09-16 9am ET: next W3C/IETF liaison call (Re: Mark your calendars: 2 September 9am ET)

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sun, 05 September 2010 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52EE3A672E for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L4QdbP8m6fGQ for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840293A65A5 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.28.78.136] (188.28.78.136.threembb.co.uk [188.28.78.136]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TIQG3gBIEAzw@rufus.isode.com>; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:08:47 +0100
Message-ID: <4C8406CF.4030709@isode.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:08:31 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Subject: Re: 2010-09-16 9am ET: next W3C/IETF liaison call (Re: Mark your calendars: 2 September 9am ET)
References: <550E3C19-96F5-49B0-9C83-74EB187044E8@w3.org> <1282658421.2270.11.camel@chacal> <C4CFFB5F360091E09729BD51@PST.JCK.COM> <7AA5AAA0-C7A3-455C-9987-FF311E0EA0DB@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <7AA5AAA0-C7A3-455C-9987-FF311E0EA0DB@w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:08:20 -0000

Hi Thomas,

Thomas Roessler wrote:

>It looks like most of the parties can do the 16 September 9am Eastern slot.  Let's move the call to then.  We'll loose Tim, but I hope we'll keep everybody else.  I'll circulate an agenda a few days before the call. If there are specific items that you want to discuss, this would be a good time to propose them.
>  
>
One more discussion topic for the call:

Possible HTTP Streaming BOF during IETF in Beijing.
(Note that it looks like IESG and IAB will be discussing/approving BOFs 
later on the same day).

>We won't use the 2 September slot.
>  
>