Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 27 February 2012 17:43 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 9822D21F87C7 for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:43:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-102.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599,
FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fsdxvVHylH5 for
<w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:43:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com
[209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2DA21F87D4 for
<w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:43:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbeh20 with SMTP id eh20so1901503obb.31 for
<w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:43:02 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of barryleiba@gmail.com designates
10.182.44.10 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.44.10;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of barryleiba@gmail.com
designates 10.182.44.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=barryleiba@gmail.com;
dkim=pass header.i=barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.44.10]) by 10.182.44.10 with SMTP id
a10mr5373872obm.43.1330364582542 (num_hops = 1);
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:43:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=uUiJ03HXK0C5TSSZPNpysA1sJxeJXqqVjk7P5ZSvhBc=;
b=k1/riSCaGRDH9PMNhiGxk/lNdWVYmJ6KGMrTPzj7mJUUmlEDbIcIKmrxBhLXXtIzZa
YjAamnpol1hJ8JG1zqrrw/YjuNn+R7fWAl+j1CJhzan2utxN3QCThFCvwYfjsM5UEtMs
98rj15Eg81rENH48DzQX5Iy7wBvCaJfwduV6Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.44.10 with SMTP id a10mr4724549obm.43.1330364582455;
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:43:02 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.60.29.106 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:43:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F4BBD15.5080501@stpeter.im>
References: <59D825DA-6E83-4DF7-9AC9-93B8D0E51870@w3.org>
<4F3AD0C1.40409@stpeter.im> <E7196964-6F12-4D6C-BD6B-CA3C5A4B28C0@w3.org>
<CF3F3387-C3B1-4FF8-8425-F335A2E4C1DD@mnot.net> <4F3C3F5A.40002@stpeter.im>
<4F3D743F.6020506@stpeter.im>
<CAC4RtVAeUw2nHj+_JNypZ4r8k=ML4sPtovbb0kZqDmO_H1cXzw@mail.gmail.com>
<86F6EC9A-8329-4946-AB3F-08E8C916A796@mnot.net>
<2E184DB9-CE7C-4EF6-A4C8-2E66745AB041@w3.org> <4F4BBD15.5080501@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:43:02 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9aiF59n-7FaWjYibnv5TeTlDh_E
Message-ID: <CALaySJJfA7tMmPj=QNOQgOvaLNHyzPq0J_p3tJWX38wdubPPXg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Administration of the W3C/IETF liaison <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:43:03 -0000
>>> What we're really trying to optimise for here is not making someone get up at >>> 3am, hence the lesser-degree suckiness that results. >> >> ... like, 11pm for me. > > Sorry about that. Shall we move it to a bit earlier? Problem is that much earlier in Europe is too early in Australia, and Mark has set 9 a.m. as his earliest available time: 2 p.m. in California 5 p.m. in New York 11 p.m. in Berlin 9 a.m. in Sydney I have a continuing conflict between 5 and 6 my time. I said OK to 6 p.m., but that's midnight for Thomas. I could do 4 p.m., but that's 8 a.m. for Mark, and he said no to that. My guess is that Mark has to deal with family at that hour, and can't start until 9. So that all means that we have to miss someone, and I'm the most expendable. I'm used to this stuff, working for a Chinese company. I have conference calls with China on Monday nights, 8 to 11 or 9 to midnight for me, depending upon the time of year. Waddyagonnado? b
- Fwd: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Thomas Roessler
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Mark Nottingham
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Barry Leiba
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Mark Nottingham
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Barry Leiba
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Thomas Roessler
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Barry Leiba
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Thomas Roessler
- Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29 Mark Nottingham