Re: Next call?
Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Tue, 19 January 2010 15:06 UTC
Return-Path: <connolly@w3.org>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 859BE3A6452 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:06:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VfMt1ZylM3Qk for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homer.w3.org (homer.w3.org [128.30.52.30]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B823A659B for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>;
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (jay.w3.org [128.30.52.169]) by homer.w3.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 616D04EF35; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:06:51 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Next call?
From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <7255A4D3-8DF3-4939-8468-B2861572AA41@mnot.net>
References: <7255A4D3-8DF3-4939-8468-B2861572AA41@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:06:51 -0600
Message-ID: <1263913611.3452.3516.camel@pav.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:06:57 -0000
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 13:41 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Hi, > > The IETF has a plenary coming up <https://www.ietf.org/meeting/77/>; should we attempt to schedule a call soon? > > Whose turn is it to drive? It's not explicit in recent minutes, but PLH chaired the most recent one, in October, and mnot chaired before that, in June. That suggests an every-other schedule with the IETF on point this time. But it's also consistent with mnot having done several in a row and now PLH doing several in a row. "PLH: next meeting before thanksgiving meeting adjourned " 08 Oct 2009 http://www.w3.org/2009/10/06-ietf-minutes.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ietf-w3c/2009Oct/0010.html Message-Id: <1255988270.16879.59.camel@chacal> 15 Jun 2009 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ietf-w3c/2009Jul/0000.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
- Next call? Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call? Dan Connolly
- Re: Next call? Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call? Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call? John C Klensin
- Re: Next call? Mark Nottingham