Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29

[Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>]

On 28/02/2012, at 4:43 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:

>>>> What we're really trying to optimise for here is not making someone get up at
>>>> 3am, hence the lesser-degree suckiness that results.
>>> 
>>> ... like, 11pm for me.
>> 
>> Sorry about that. Shall we move it to a bit earlier?
> 
> Problem is that much earlier in Europe is too early in Australia, and
> Mark has set 9 a.m. as his earliest available time:
> 
> 2 p.m. in California
> 5 p.m. in New York
> 11 p.m. in Berlin
> 9 a.m. in Sydney
> 
> I have a continuing conflict between 5 and 6 my time.  I said OK to 6
> p.m., but that's midnight for Thomas.  I could do 4 p.m., but that's 8
> a.m. for Mark, and he said no to that.  My guess is that Mark has to
> deal with family at that hour, and can't start until 9.

Correct. Also, I already have a call from 6am-7:30.

> 
> So that all means that we have to miss someone, and I'm the most expendable.
> 
> I'm used to this stuff, working for a Chinese company.  I have
> conference calls with China on Monday nights, 8 to 11 or 9 to midnight
> for me, depending upon the time of year.  Waddyagonnado?
> 
> b

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/