Re: Media Types (was: Re: Next W3C/IETF call scheduling)

[John C Klensin <[e-mail]>]

--On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 16:48 -0500 Philippe Le
Hegaret <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 19:27 -0500, John C Klensin wrote:
>> 
>> --On Friday, February 15, 2013 17:12 -0500 Philippe Le Hegaret
>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> > IETF 86 is approaching and Thomas and I have a list of items
>> > (json bof, ipr, http auth, video codec, media types).
>> 
>> As a co-author of the relevant spec, I've been operating under
>> the assumption that we no longer have major outstanding issues
>> about media types.  If that is not true, I'd like to hear
>> about it, in detail, enough before the call that I (and, to
>> the extent necessary, Barry and Pete) have useful things to
>> say.
> 
> At this point, I do not believe this is a issue about the
> specification itself but most probably about its
> implementations on the W3C and IETF sides.
> 
> I'm getting reports that the current email system makes the
> process prone to failures. It's difficult to track the status
> on our side and I had one case where the email never reached
> me.

Ok.  Not anything I can do anything about unless there are far
more specifics.   Pete and Barry, would it be useful to set up a
call between Philippe and Michelle to see if we can get to the
bottom of this before more time is wasted on operational
disconnects and/or vague descriptions of problems and concerns?

    best,
    john