IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Media Types (was: Re: Next W3C/IETF call scheduling)

Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> Wed, 20 February 2013 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <plh@w3.org>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACC521E804C for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:48:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.241, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ujIGduSa7749 for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8244021E803A for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 30-5-162.wireless.csail.mit.edu ([128.30.5.162] helo=[10.0.2.15]) by jay.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <plh@w3.org>) id 1U8HWW-000216-47; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:48:20 -0500
Message-ID: <1361396896.1788.99.camel@chacal>
Subject: Re: Media Types (was: Re: Next W3C/IETF call scheduling)
From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
To: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:48:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <06501804F61E9CEDF056E6F9@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
References: <1360966338.1769.94.camel@chacal> <06501804F61E9CEDF056E6F9@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Administration of the W3C/IETF liaison <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:48:21 -0000

On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 19:27 -0500, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> --On Friday, February 15, 2013 17:12 -0500 Philippe Le Hegaret
> <plh@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> > IETF 86 is approaching and Thomas and I have a list of items
> > (json bof, ipr, http auth, video codec, media types).
> 
> As a co-author of the relevant spec, I've been operating under
> the assumption that we no longer have major outstanding issues
> about media types.  If that is not true, I'd like to hear about
> it, in detail, enough before the call that I (and, to the extent
> necessary, Barry and Pete) have useful things to say.

At this point, I do not believe this is a issue about the specification
itself but most probably about its implementations on the W3C and IETF
sides.

I'm getting reports that the current email system makes the process
prone to failures. It's difficult to track the status on our side and I
had one case where the email never reached me.

Philippe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email