Re: Next call
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 02 July 2010 21:40 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 3C0543A6868 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.949,
BAYES_50=0.001, NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P8KLFRg+oTw1 for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6303A67B4 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>;
Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wlan-snve-152-225.corp.yahoo.com (unknown [209.131.62.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate
requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADB21509DE for
<w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 17:40:47 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Subject: Re: Next call
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <5061509E-334F-4C11-92DE-337BEBE2487C@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:40:45 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <18927299-AB3F-4F1B-ABC6-D33E4EFBA9C0@mnot.net>
References: <5061509E-334F-4C11-92DE-337BEBE2487C@mnot.net>
To: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:40:46 -0000
Right now, we have two participants from the IETF, one from the W3C, and two or three possible time slots. Anyone else? If no-one wants to come from the US, it does make finding a time simpler... On 25/06/2010, at 9:59 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > It seems like we should have a call before the next IETF meeting, especially considering the HASMAT work and other developments. > > AIUI we need to consider the timezones of the following locations when scheduling: > > - Melbourne > - Luxembourg > - London > - Boston > - Denver > - San Francisco > - (anywhere someone is travelling) > > Accordingly, someone is going to be "not happy" about the call's time; please take this in consideration when responding to: > http://doodle.com/2cvsyi38dxvx868k > > If none of these dates work for you and you need to be on the call, please suggest an alternative date/time. > > Agenda items also welcome, so far I have: > - HASMAT IETF BoF > - W3C Web Security work > - HYBI > - Link Relations registry > > Cheers, > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call John C Klensin
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Philippe Le Hegaret
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Thomas Roessler
- post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… John C Klensin
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Russ Housley
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre