Re: Next W3C/IETF call scheduling

Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> Mon, 25 February 2013 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tlr@w3.org>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B7D21F934D for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:34:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WPdkBm3-yYu6 for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:34:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B298D21F934E for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:34:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [88.207.141.200] (helo=[192.168.2.107]) by jay.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <tlr@w3.org>) id 1U9z81-0003sb-Ci; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:34:05 -0500
Subject: Re: Next W3C/IETF call scheduling
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <1361396658.1788.95.camel@chacal>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:34:13 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <0550CC41-96CA-484A-A66D-D168339E8B9A@w3.org>
References: <1360966338.1769.94.camel@chacal> <512177F4.2060804@cs.tcd.ie> <1361396658.1788.95.camel@chacal>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Administration of the W3C/IETF liaison <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:34:10 -0000

On 2013-02-20, at 22:44 +0100, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 00:38 +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> Hiya,
>> 
>> On 02/15/2013 10:12 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
>>> IETF 86 is approaching and Thomas and I have a list of items (json bof,
>>> ipr, http auth, video codec, media types).
>> 
>> On agenda - could we add drm or whatever is the term-de-jour? I'm
>> wondering what's up in w3c there given recent reports related I
>> guess to [1].
> 
> Sure.
> 
>> I'm not so much interested in commenting on developments, more
>> in understanding what and perhaps why. If its possible and makes
>> sense I'd also be interested in any views as to how that might
>> be similar to or different from DNT.
> 
> My list now contains
> json bof, ipr, http auth, video, media types, drm, dnt

+ json calendar and contacts formats