Re: Next call?
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 20 January 2010 22:45 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8724128C0E8 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:45:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xxi0HCSx9Xnp for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:45:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B5528C10F for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>;
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:45:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.167.68]) (using TLSv1
with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by
smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B6C322E257;
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:44:59 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Next call?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <1263913611.3452.3516.camel@pav.lan>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:44:56 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F93D4966-4251-4815-AA6C-D32190D60560@mnot.net>
References: <7255A4D3-8DF3-4939-8468-B2861572AA41@mnot.net>
<1263913611.3452.3516.camel@pav.lan>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:45:14 -0000
I'm happy to chair. How does the first week in March look for people? Do we have reason to talk earlier than that? Cheers, On 20/01/2010, at 2:06 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 13:41 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The IETF has a plenary coming up <https://www.ietf.org/meeting/77/>; should we attempt to schedule a call soon? >> >> Whose turn is it to drive? > > It's not explicit in recent minutes, but PLH chaired > the most recent one, in October, and mnot chaired before that, > in June. That suggests an every-other schedule with > the IETF on point this time. But it's also consistent > with mnot having done several in a row and now PLH doing > several in a row. > > "PLH: next meeting before thanksgiving > > meeting adjourned " > 08 Oct 2009 > http://www.w3.org/2009/10/06-ietf-minutes.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ietf-w3c/2009Oct/0010.html > Message-Id: <1255988270.16879.59.camel@chacal> > > 15 Jun 2009 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ietf-w3c/2009Jul/0000.html > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Next call? Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call? Dan Connolly
- Re: Next call? Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call? Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call? John C Klensin
- Re: Next call? Mark Nottingham