Next Call Scheduling
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 25 September 2012 17:51 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F48F21F8811 for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dfasFptRP7ss for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9328F21F8808 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.30.20.93] (unknown [72.246.0.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E781022E255 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:51:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 1
Subject: Next Call Scheduling
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:51:35 -0400
To: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <51F2D436-B290-4B28-919B-ED68D5E157D0@mnot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.1 \(1498\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1498)
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Administration of the W3C/IETF liaison <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:51:48 -0000
I know it's short notice, but I'm on the US East Coast this week, and in London next week, so it might be significantly easier to schedule a call if we do it in that window. Would people be available later this week and/or early next week? If I get a few responses in the positive, I'll send out a poll. Thanks, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Next Call Scheduling Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next Call Scheduling Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next Call Scheduling Barry Leiba
- Re: Next Call Scheduling Stephen Farrell
- Re: Next Call Scheduling Thomas Roessler
- Re: Next Call Scheduling John C Klensin
- Re: Next Call Scheduling Sean Turner
- Re: Next Call Scheduling - Monday 2-3pm UK/London? Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next Call Scheduling - Monday 2-3pm UK/London? Barry Leiba
- Re: Next Call Scheduling - Monday 2-3pm UK/London? Stephen Farrell
- Re: Next Call Scheduling - Monday 2-3pm UK/London? Sean Turner