Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs
Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> Sat, 19 February 2011 17:14 UTC
Return-Path: <tlr@w3.org>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id E281D3A6F7D for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 19 Feb 2011 09:14:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iMThbK6uWksH for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 09:14:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 314363A6E48 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>;
Sat, 19 Feb 2011 09:14:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip-83-99-36-215.dyn.luxdsl.pt.lu ([83.99.36.215]
helo=[192.168.2.115]) by jay.w3.org with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <tlr@w3.org>) id
1PqqOQ-0002sq-KC; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:14:50 -0500
Subject: Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <C802DF3DA534AEE44830CD20@PST.JCK.COM>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:14:47 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1EC7801A-A28B-4DBD-95C1-7FEE23055F77@w3.org>
References: <4D5EA5A6.70706@stpeter.im> <612494D26335411D1E3D3578@PST.JCK.COM>
<4D5EC8F6.1050100@stpeter.im> <C802DF3DA534AEE44830CD20@PST.JCK.COM>
To: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:14:18 -0000
On 18 Feb 2011, at 20:46, John C Klensin wrote: > "Policy" may be dignifying it too much. It is just what we > have done, more or less by informal collective understanding. > Either Leslie or I (I can't even remember which one) made a > decision a long time ago and everyone at the time seemed to > think it was reasonable. FWIW, the understanding you're articulating there sounds very, very reasonable to me.
- administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Patrik Fältström
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs John C Klensin
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs John C Klensin
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Alexey Melnikov
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Thomas Roessler
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Mark Nottingham