IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Next call

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 03 December 2010 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A183A69BA for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:39:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.754
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NmSs0RSxjZUR for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:38:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579E53A6452 for <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:38:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.2.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D648D22E256; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:39:57 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Next call
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CF93734.7070402@stpeter.im>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 09:39:57 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8762D8F9-5B98-412D-BC5C-F35EE8BCC954@mnot.net>
References: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net> <3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net> <4CF93734.7070402@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: w3c-policy <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:39:04 -0000

Good in theory, but I'll be out of contact until Jan 24.

On 04/12/2010, at 5:30 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> How about mid January? That would give folks time to complete some
> post-holiday action items before the next call.
> 
> On 11/3/10 11:32 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Perhaps obviously, we skipped this one due to lack of interest / availability.
>> 
>> Should we try to schedule one more before the end of the year?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> On 18/10/2010, at 1:17 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> 
>>> As discussed at our last call, we're aiming to have our next call the week before W3C TPAC.
>>> 
>>> To that end, please fill out the following poll with your preferred times:
>>> http://doodle.com/z75e2nms6yzv2pye
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>> 
>>> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email