IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs

John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com> Fri, 18 February 2011 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <klensin@jck.com>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9A13A6FC3 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:46:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S5po9BQBrrKS for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:46:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538353A6D16 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:46:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1PqWI5-0001Ca-Ap; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:46:57 -0500
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:46:56 -0500
From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Subject: Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs
Message-ID: <C802DF3DA534AEE44830CD20@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <4D5EC8F6.1050100@stpeter.im>
References: <4D5EA5A6.70706@stpeter.im> <612494D26335411D1E3D3578@PST.JCK.COM> <4D5EC8F6.1050100@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:46:26 -0000

--On Friday, February 18, 2011 12:31 -0700 Peter Saint-Andre
<stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:

>...
>> Of course, that policy can be changed if it makes sense to
>> those most actively involved.  But, since you implicitly
>> asked the question about what the policy is/was, that is the
>> answer.
> 
> Thanks. I was going to explicitly ask about the policy, but I
> wasn't sure if there even was a policy (or if there needed to
> be).

"Policy" may be dignifying it too much.   It is just what we
have done, more or less by informal collective understanding.
Either Leslie or I (I can't even remember which one) made a
decision a long time ago and everyone at the time seemed to
think it was reasonable.

   john

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email