Re: Next call
John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com> Tue, 06 July 2010 19:14 UTC
Return-Path: <klensin@jck.com>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 4EF063A693B for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PcMb7bqeVOTP for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C1A3A696C for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>;
Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim
4.34) id 1OWDbR-0002vv-RA; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:14:45 -0400
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:14:45 -0400
From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "W3C/IETF" <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Next call
Message-ID: <ADFC9B67FCC0DF6A1682C243@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <18927299-AB3F-4F1B-ABC6-D33E4EFBA9C0@mnot.net>
References: <5061509E-334F-4C11-92DE-337BEBE2487C@mnot.net>
<18927299-AB3F-4F1B-ABC6-D33E4EFBA9C0@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:14:48 -0000
--On Friday, July 02, 2010 14:40 -0700 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Right now, we have two participants from the IETF, one from > the W3C, and two or three possible time slots. > > Anyone else? If no-one wants to come from the US, it does make > finding a time simpler... Mark, I keep strange hours, so am generally less sensitive to times than I am to days. But, somehow, the doodle poll announcement got past me in the general confusion. Have filled it in now, ignoring yesterday and today which I assume would be hard. john
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call John C Klensin
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Philippe Le Hegaret
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Thomas Roessler
- post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… John C Klensin
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Russ Housley
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre