IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Next call

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sat, 04 December 2010 11:13 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5483A6A86 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 03:13:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.023
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.023 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.507, BAYES_00=-2.599, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gIfdoEKfjg60 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 03:13:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ED63A6A81 for <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 03:13:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [92.40.162.159] (92.40.162.159.sub.mbb.three.co.uk [92.40.162.159]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TPoimQAbxRAq@rufus.isode.com>; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 11:14:38 +0000
Message-ID: <4CFA2285.8000401@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:14:13 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Subject: Re: Next call
References: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net> <3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net> <4CF93734.7070402@stpeter.im> <8762D8F9-5B98-412D-BC5C-F35EE8BCC954@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <8762D8F9-5B98-412D-BC5C-F35EE8BCC954@mnot.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: w3c-policy <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:13:22 -0000

Mark Nottingham wrote:

>Good in theory, but I'll be out of contact until Jan 24.
>  
>
And of January is Ok we well. Unless people really prefer to have a 
phone call before Christmas (I am unavailable Dec 8-15).

>On 04/12/2010, at 5:30 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>  
>
>>How about mid January? That would give folks time to complete some
>>post-holiday action items before the next call.
>>
>>On 11/3/10 11:32 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Perhaps obviously, we skipped this one due to lack of interest / availability.
>>>
>>>Should we try to schedule one more before the end of the year?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>On 18/10/2010, at 1:17 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>As discussed at our last call, we're aiming to have our next call the week before W3C TPAC.
>>>>
>>>>To that end, please fill out the following poll with your preferred times:
>>>>http://doodle.com/z75e2nms6yzv2pye
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>>>        
>>>>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email