IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sat, 19 February 2011 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AF93A6E08 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 07:46:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.490, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6tpk4VHJ8lx2 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 07:46:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BF53A6E02 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 07:46:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.8.179.229] (3-254.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.254.3]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TV=l5gADL5ZY@rufus.isode.com>; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:46:47 +0000
Message-ID: <4D5FE5CD.7000808@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:46:21 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
Subject: Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs
References: <4D5EA5A6.70706@stpeter.im> <612494D26335411D1E3D3578@PST.JCK.COM> <4D5EC8F6.1050100@stpeter.im> <C802DF3DA534AEE44830CD20@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <C802DF3DA534AEE44830CD20@PST.JCK.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:46:13 -0000

John C Klensin wrote:

>--On Friday, February 18, 2011 12:31 -0700 Peter Saint-Andre
><stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
>  
>
>>...
>>    
>>
>>>Of course, that policy can be changed if it makes sense to
>>>those most actively involved.  But, since you implicitly
>>>asked the question about what the policy is/was, that is the
>>>answer.
>>>      
>>>
>>Thanks. I was going to explicitly ask about the policy, but I
>>wasn't sure if there even was a policy (or if there needed to
>>be).
>>    
>>
>"Policy" may be dignifying it too much.   It is just what we
>have done, more or less by informal collective understanding.
>Either Leslie or I (I can't even remember which one) made a
>decision a long time ago and everyone at the time seemed to
>think it was reasonable.
>  
>
I think the de-facto policy is fine.
In the past some ADs asked to be removed upon stepping down from IESG.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email