IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 15 February 2012 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0044321E8084 for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:16:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.071
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.071 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.472, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OYXYdLgk7lMi for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:16:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A735821E8032 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:16:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mnot-mini.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.36.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 524CC50A65; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:16:05 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <E7196964-6F12-4D6C-BD6B-CA3C5A4B28C0@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:15:58 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CF3F3387-C3B1-4FF8-8425-F335A2E4C1DD@mnot.net>
References: <59D825DA-6E83-4DF7-9AC9-93B8D0E51870@w3.org> <4F3AD0C1.40409@stpeter.im> <E7196964-6F12-4D6C-BD6B-CA3C5A4B28C0@w3.org>
To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Administration of the W3C/IETF liaison <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:16:18 -0000

WFM.

On 15/02/2012, at 11:05 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> I'd prefer the week of the 27th.  The week of March 5, I'm only available Monday and Tuesday.
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2012-02-14, at 22:23 +0100, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29
>> Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:09:38 +0000
>> Resent-From: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
>> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:09:28 +0100
>> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
>> To: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
>> 
>> <snip/>
>> 
>> * Next Meeting
>> 
>> ACTION: Peter to schedule next call at end of January or early
>> February.
>> 
>> -------- End Message --------
>> 
>> Sorry about that, got wrapped up with other tasks.
>> 
>> At this point, would it work to do something the week of February 27 or
>> March 5, perhaps?
>> 
>> /psa
>> 
>> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email