Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 24 November 2010 22:11 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 0FFB028C17E for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:11:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.738
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-104.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.139, BAYES_00=-2.599,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DGlP3yU+qc8e for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:11:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2C328C175 for
<w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:11:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.2.20]) (using TLSv1
with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by
smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D8EA22E253;
Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:11:57 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <1290608638.21852.70.camel@chacal>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:11:54 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <12ACDAD2-624A-48B8-859D-6C4D9A900AF0@mnot.net>
References: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net>
<3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net>
<1288857104.2553.74.camel@chacal> <4CD27037.4050403@isode.com>
<061235D3-D1D0-4D2A-BC65-E6533D086D56@w3.org>
<26C94C81-D37D-4A99-990F-AC8E8516D7B4@w3.org>
<08C0EE68-B245-4836-AFF9-7DBC1BCA7543@mnot.net>
<1290436008.8884.10.camel@chacal> <F78951FCE63A8A36CD366530@PST.JCK.COM>
<1290608638.21852.70.camel@chacal>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: w3c-policy <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:11:05 -0000
I've removed Lisa. Adding Alexey might not make sense, given he's stepping down as AD soon. Russ, just to make sure you're aware -- this list is *only* used for scheduling calls and similar administrative matters (theoretically, it's also for confidential matters, but so far we haven't had to resort to that.). Technical discussion happens on the public list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ietf-w3c/ See also: http://esw.w3.org/IetfW3cLiaison Cheers, On 25/11/2010, at 1:23 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > I added Russ using his vigilsec email address, > > For the record, the current moderators for this list are Lisa, Mark, and > myself. > > Mark and I have the password for the administration tool (and Lisa might > have it as well). > > Philippe > > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:02 -0500, John C Klensin wrote: >> By the way, during discussions in Beijing, Russ Housley (copied) >> expressed concern (if I've got this right) that he didn't know >> enough about this group and wasn't represented on it. Could >> whomever is maintaining the mailing list please add him to it >> and do so soon enough that he is able to participate in the next >> specific scheduling exercise? >> >> Russ, would you prefer to be subscribed under your own address >> or the ietf-chair one? >> >> john >> >> >> > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call John C Klensin
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Philippe Le Hegaret
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Thomas Roessler
- post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… John C Klensin
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Russ Housley
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre