Re: Next call?

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 22 January 2010 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE1C3A67F8 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:28:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.882, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eVBG1Nhh6MAg for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:28:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5E13A67AD for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:28:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chancetrain-lm.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.167.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8933422E1F3 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:27:58 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Subject: Re: Next call?
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <F93D4966-4251-4815-AA6C-D32190D60560@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:27:55 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <428A33E2-C1D8-4AE9-A5ED-57D4F26F94B2@mnot.net>
References: <7255A4D3-8DF3-4939-8468-B2861572AA41@mnot.net> <1263913611.3452.3516.camel@pav.lan> <F93D4966-4251-4815-AA6C-D32190D60560@mnot.net>
To: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:28:11 -0000

OK, I've received a few encouraging responses, so here's the usual poll:

http://doodle.com/y4dbnay46yu7psu8

Please respond ASAP.


On 21/01/2010, at 9:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> I'm happy to chair.
> 
> How does the first week in March look for people? Do we have reason to talk earlier than that?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> On 20/01/2010, at 2:06 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 13:41 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> The IETF has a plenary coming up <https://www.ietf.org/meeting/77/>; should we attempt to schedule a call soon?
>>> 
>>> Whose turn is it to drive?
>> 
>> It's not explicit in recent minutes, but PLH chaired
>> the most recent one, in October, and mnot chaired before that,
>> in June. That suggests an every-other schedule with
>> the IETF on point this time. But it's also consistent
>> with mnot having done several in a row and now PLH doing
>> several in a row.
>> 
>> "PLH: next meeting before thanksgiving 
>> 
>> meeting adjourned "
>> 08 Oct 2009
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/10/06-ietf-minutes.html
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ietf-w3c/2009Oct/0010.html
>> Message-Id: <1255988270.16879.59.camel@chacal>
>> 
>> 15 Jun 2009
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ietf-w3c/2009Jul/0000.html
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>> gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
> 


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/