IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 15 February 2012 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA6221E8085 for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.739
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xEyCzrtiiILJ for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD0F21E8084 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squire.local (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 867A140058; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:38:17 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4F3C3F5A.40002@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:27:22 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Subject: Re: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29
References: <59D825DA-6E83-4DF7-9AC9-93B8D0E51870@w3.org> <4F3AD0C1.40409@stpeter.im> <E7196964-6F12-4D6C-BD6B-CA3C5A4B28C0@w3.org> <CF3F3387-C3B1-4FF8-8425-F335A2E4C1DD@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CF3F3387-C3B1-4FF8-8425-F335A2E4C1DD@mnot.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Administration of the W3C/IETF liaison <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:27:25 -0000

OK, I'll set up a Doodle poll.

On 2/15/12 4:15 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> WFM.
> 
> On 15/02/2012, at 11:05 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> 
>> I'd prefer the week of the 27th.  The week of March 5, I'm only available Monday and Tuesday.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2012-02-14, at 22:23 +0100, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: minutes: W3C/IETF liaison call 2011-11-29
>>> Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:09:38 +0000
>>> Resent-From: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
>>> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:09:28 +0100
>>> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
>>> To: public-ietf-w3c@w3.org
>>>
>>> <snip/>
>>>
>>> * Next Meeting
>>>
>>> ACTION: Peter to schedule next call at end of January or early
>>> February.
>>>
>>> -------- End Message --------
>>>
>>> Sorry about that, got wrapped up with other tasks.
>>>
>>> At this point, would it work to do something the week of February 27 or
>>> March 5, perhaps?
>>>
>>> /psa
>>>
>>>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email