good news on link header registry Re: March 2: revised agenda
Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Thu, 18 February 2010 16:18 UTC
Return-Path: <connolly@w3.org>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 893DE3A7ED1 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:18:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c03ro4KkdnrK for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:18:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homer.w3.org (homer.w3.org [128.30.52.30]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id A97CB28C153 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>;
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:18:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (jay.w3.org [128.30.52.169]) by homer.w3.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 299A64EF99; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:19:46 -0500 (EST)
Subject: good news on link header registry Re: March 2: revised agenda
From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <AD3B25BF-880B-4482-A373-FAE890C91907@mnot.net>
References: <D5C3FB2E-F0E4-42CC-B23C-74091A5F55DD@mnot.net>
<AD3B25BF-880B-4482-A373-FAE890C91907@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:19:46 -0600
Message-ID: <1266509986.7402.173.camel@pav.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:18:05 -0000
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 14:11 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: [...] > 6) link header / registry Mark, great work on this one! [[ On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Change proposal follows. > > Summary > > This change replaces the Wiki link relation registry with that defined in "Web Linking," an IETF draft proposed for Standards Track, while aligning HTML5's use of links with that described therein. This seems relatively uncontroversial; I suggest we just go with the usual lightweight bug process for this rather than the full-on Change Proposal process and so on. My only suggestion really would be that we get several different people to exercise the registry to see how and whether it works in practice. We could have a few people register the various HTML5 fields, and a few people register some rel values from the spec or from the wiki, and see if the process is effective. If it is, then referring to it seems like a no-brainer and I'd be happy to make the appropriate changes. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson ]] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0225.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
- March 2: preliminary agenda Mark Nottingham
- Re: March 2: preliminary agenda Alexey Melnikov
- Re: March 2: preliminary agenda Thomas Roessler
- RE: March 2: preliminary agenda Larry Masinter
- Re: March 2: preliminary agenda Julian Reschke
- March 2: revised agenda Mark Nottingham
- good news on link header registry Re: March 2: re… Dan Connolly
- March 2: revised agenda Mark Nottingham
- Re: March 2: revised agenda Mark Nottingham