IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Next call

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 10 February 2011 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE0D3A67AB for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:52:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B0DbOVMxkV06 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091813A67A4 for <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-185.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-185.cisco.com [64.101.72.185]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76A6C40393; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:09:49 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4D5433DB.9060805@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:52:11 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Subject: Re: Next call
References: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net> <3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net> <4CF93734.7070402@stpeter.im> <8762D8F9-5B98-412D-BC5C-F35EE8BCC954@mnot.net> <4CFA2285.8000401@isode.com> <EB2FC9EB-B541-4028-8F2B-758B1D458515@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <EB2FC9EB-B541-4028-8F2B-758B1D458515@mnot.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030604030903030702040308"
Cc: w3c-policy <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:52:02 -0000

I think it's time to revisit. :)

I'm happy to organize this meeting.

On 12/5/10 6:07 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> OK. Let's revisit in January, then.
> 
> 
> On 04/12/2010, at 10:14 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> 
>> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> Good in theory, but I'll be out of contact until Jan 24.
>>>
>> And of January is Ok we well. Unless people really prefer to have a phone call before Christmas (I am unavailable Dec 8-15).
>>
>>> On 04/12/2010, at 5:30 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>
>>>> How about mid January? That would give folks time to complete some
>>>> post-holiday action items before the next call.
>>>>
>>>> On 11/3/10 11:32 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>> Perhaps obviously, we skipped this one due to lack of interest / availability.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we try to schedule one more before the end of the year?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 18/10/2010, at 1:17 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>> As discussed at our last call, we're aiming to have our next call the week before W3C TPAC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To that end, please fill out the following poll with your preferred times:
>>>>>> http://doodle.com/z75e2nms6yzv2pye
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>>>>>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email