Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs
John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com> Fri, 18 February 2011 19:24 UTC
Return-Path: <klensin@jck.com>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id F053B3A6E51 for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:24:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id holAoDOsA+Db for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:24:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DA33A6A0F for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>;
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:24:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim
4.34) id 1PqVwp-0000pk-Kw; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:24:59 -0500
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:24:58 -0500
From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "W3C/IETF" <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs
Message-ID: <612494D26335411D1E3D3578@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <4D5EA5A6.70706@stpeter.im>
References: <4D5EA5A6.70706@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:24:35 -0000
--On Friday, February 18, 2011 10:00 -0700 Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote: > In addition, the current list of subscribers appears to > include a number of people who are no longer actively serving > in IETF roles that would necessitate their involvement (Ted > Hardie, Harald Alvestrand, Patrik Fältström). I don't know > if we have a policy about who is and is not allowed onto this > list, but perhaps it's fine for them to still be subscribed if > they don't mind the occasional email traffic. The historical policy has been that people who have been on the list because of earlier roles but who -- are willing to continue and -- may contribute useful contemporary or historical perspective are left on it. One way of looking at the reason involves noticing that we really don't have a vast surplus of talent and perspective in the areas that overlap between the IETF and W3C. Of course, that policy can be changed if it makes sense to those most actively involved. But, since you implicitly asked the question about what the policy is/was, that is the answer. john
- administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Patrik Fältström
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs John C Klensin
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs John C Klensin
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Alexey Melnikov
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Thomas Roessler
- Re: administrivia: new/missing/former ADs Mark Nottingham