Re: Next call

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 18 February 2011 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5E63A6B8E for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:41:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NfCJfYNe2b4E for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:41:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2BA3A6C75 for <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:41:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (72-163-0-129.cisco.com [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CACFD40D25; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:00:43 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4D5EA16F.3090304@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:42:23 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Subject: Re: Next call
References: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net> <3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net> <4CF93734.7070402@stpeter.im> <8762D8F9-5B98-412D-BC5C-F35EE8BCC954@mnot.net> <4CFA2285.8000401@isode.com> <EB2FC9EB-B541-4028-8F2B-758B1D458515@mnot.net> <4D5433DB.9060805@stpeter.im> <4F040C64-EF15-4F57-9279-9A374459AAB0@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F040C64-EF15-4F57-9279-9A374459AAB0@mnot.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms040506050903000408040402"
Cc: w3c-policy <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:41:53 -0000

The Doodle poll is here:

http://doodle.com/ukuc4sumq3wa6eag

Because Mark is in the Bay Area starting March 8, I have offered dates
that week (except Thursday morning in the Americas, when IETF ADs have
an IESG telechat).

On 2/11/11 4:39 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Thanks, peter. Why don't you send out a doodle for people's availability?
> 
> If we can wait a few weeks (early March, e.g., week of the 7th), I'll be in the US, and that might simplify scheduling...
> 
> 
> On 11/02/2011, at 5:52 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> I think it's time to revisit. :)
>>
>> I'm happy to organize this meeting.
>>
>> On 12/5/10 6:07 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> OK. Let's revisit in January, then.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/12/2010, at 10:14 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Good in theory, but I'll be out of contact until Jan 24.
>>>>>
>>>> And of January is Ok we well. Unless people really prefer to have a phone call before Christmas (I am unavailable Dec 8-15).
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/12/2010, at 5:30 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How about mid January? That would give folks time to complete some
>>>>>> post-holiday action items before the next call.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/3/10 11:32 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps obviously, we skipped this one due to lack of interest / availability.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should we try to schedule one more before the end of the year?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 18/10/2010, at 1:17 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As discussed at our last call, we're aiming to have our next call the week before W3C TPAC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To that end, please fill out the following poll with your preferred times:
>>>>>>>> http://doodle.com/z75e2nms6yzv2pye
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>>>>>>>