Re: Next call
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 18 February 2011 16:41 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 4F5E63A6B8E for <w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:41:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NfCJfYNe2b4E for
<w3c-policy@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:41:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2BA3A6C75 for <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>;
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:41:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (72-163-0-129.cisco.com [72.163.0.129])
(Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id
CACFD40D25; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:00:43 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4D5EA16F.3090304@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:42:23 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Subject: Re: Next call
References: <05B01025-458E-40D0-B54F-9F3103E0060E@mnot.net>
<3C35C07E-9E25-4F9D-BE62-44D5E804BE6C@mnot.net> <4CF93734.7070402@stpeter.im>
<8762D8F9-5B98-412D-BC5C-F35EE8BCC954@mnot.net> <4CFA2285.8000401@isode.com>
<EB2FC9EB-B541-4028-8F2B-758B1D458515@mnot.net> <4D5433DB.9060805@stpeter.im>
<4F040C64-EF15-4F57-9279-9A374459AAB0@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F040C64-EF15-4F57-9279-9A374459AAB0@mnot.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";
micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms040506050903000408040402"
Cc: w3c-policy <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of w3c-ietf policy issues <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>,
<mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:41:53 -0000
The Doodle poll is here: http://doodle.com/ukuc4sumq3wa6eag Because Mark is in the Bay Area starting March 8, I have offered dates that week (except Thursday morning in the Americas, when IETF ADs have an IESG telechat). On 2/11/11 4:39 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Thanks, peter. Why don't you send out a doodle for people's availability? > > If we can wait a few weeks (early March, e.g., week of the 7th), I'll be in the US, and that might simplify scheduling... > > > On 11/02/2011, at 5:52 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> I think it's time to revisit. :) >> >> I'm happy to organize this meeting. >> >> On 12/5/10 6:07 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> OK. Let's revisit in January, then. >>> >>> >>> On 04/12/2010, at 10:14 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >>> >>>> Mark Nottingham wrote: >>>> >>>>> Good in theory, but I'll be out of contact until Jan 24. >>>>> >>>> And of January is Ok we well. Unless people really prefer to have a phone call before Christmas (I am unavailable Dec 8-15). >>>> >>>>> On 04/12/2010, at 5:30 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> How about mid January? That would give folks time to complete some >>>>>> post-holiday action items before the next call. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/3/10 11:32 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Perhaps obviously, we skipped this one due to lack of interest / availability. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Should we try to schedule one more before the end of the year? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 18/10/2010, at 1:17 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As discussed at our last call, we're aiming to have our next call the week before W3C TPAC. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To that end, please fill out the following poll with your preferred times: >>>>>>>> http://doodle.com/z75e2nms6yzv2pye >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >>>>>>>>
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call John C Klensin
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call -- July 8th 1pm UTC Philippe Le Hegaret
- Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Thomas Roessler
- post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison call Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… John C Klensin
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Philippe Le Hegaret
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Russ Housley
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Thomas Roessler
- Re: post-TPAC agenda items for IETF/W3C liaison c… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Mark Nottingham
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Next call Peter Saint-Andre